The book of Dene, Deane, AdeaneA genealogical history . e soules of John a Dene and Alyce his Wif This Johnmust have been the ancestor of the family, and his namebeing absent from the Odiham and Deanelands pedigree is noproof that he was not the grandson of William at Dene andAgnes Leeche, or Robert and Isabel Yonge, as the directheirs only are named. Nicholas, son of John Deane andMargery Deerhurst, 1558, was left out. Richard, one of thesons of James and Amy, is only found in a MS. pedigree inthe British Museum. Sir Henry de Dene is omitted, althoughhis arms prove him to belong to this famil
The book of Dene, Deane, AdeaneA genealogical history . e soules of John a Dene and Alyce his Wif This Johnmust have been the ancestor of the family, and his namebeing absent from the Odiham and Deanelands pedigree is noproof that he was not the grandson of William at Dene andAgnes Leeche, or Robert and Isabel Yonge, as the directheirs only are named. Nicholas, son of John Deane andMargery Deerhurst, 1558, was left out. Richard, one of thesons of James and Amy, is only found in a MS. pedigree inthe British Museum. Sir Henry de Dene is omitted, althoughhis arms prove him to belong to this family. The date, 1419,at which they are given would make him brother of Williamatte Dene and son of Robert. A good reason for conjecturing Sir Henry to be the fatherof this John a Dene is that Mr. Henry Deane, who, as weshall see, was the authority on the family arms, had placed onhis tomb in St. Lawrence, Reading, 1731, the identical armsborne by Sir Henry, which differed from those usually dis-played by the Deanelands family, in having 3 crescents sable.
Size: 1163px × 2149px
Photo credit: © The Reading Room / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., bo, bookcentury1800, bookdecade1890, bookidbookofdenedeanea00dean
