. Birth fractures and epiphyseal dislocations . Fig. 70.—Case 3. A lateral view made for the first time at the tenth weekdisclosed the more important deformity, an excessive anterior fragments were widely separated, over-riding was present, while alarge and dense mass of interposed callus fixed the fragments in a mostundesirable position. Figs. 64 and 70 present the usual picture seen in casesof birth fracture of the femur where there has been no treatment or wheretreatment has not been formulated with the aim to overcome this importantand constant Fig. 71.—Case 3. A
. Birth fractures and epiphyseal dislocations . Fig. 70.—Case 3. A lateral view made for the first time at the tenth weekdisclosed the more important deformity, an excessive anterior fragments were widely separated, over-riding was present, while alarge and dense mass of interposed callus fixed the fragments in a mostundesirable position. Figs. 64 and 70 present the usual picture seen in casesof birth fracture of the femur where there has been no treatment or wheretreatment has not been formulated with the aim to overcome this importantand constant Fig. 71.—Case 3. At the eighth month the anterior angular deformity hadbegun to assume the usual anterior curvature, characteristic of these frac-tures when the original anterior angulation has remained uncorrected.
Size: 1705px × 1465px
Photo credit: © Reading Room 2020 / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., bookcentury1900, bookdecade1910, booksubjec, booksubjectfractures
