. Bulletin of zoological nomenclature. . Article 30 (question of the type species of a genus, the name of which was first published in a generic synonymy), Report by Secretary asked for {Previous reference: Paris Session, 6th Meeting, Conclusion 24) (Previous reference: Paris Session, 6th Meeting, Conclusion 18) VOL. 4 z \2th Meeting, Paris, July, 1948. 351 by a non-binominal author and not vaUdly republished by a binonunal author prior to being cited in a specific synonymy and (2) a name which previously had existed only as a manuscript name or as a nomen nudum. Names of genera accidentally i
. Bulletin of zoological nomenclature. . Article 30 (question of the type species of a genus, the name of which was first published in a generic synonymy), Report by Secretary asked for {Previous reference: Paris Session, 6th Meeting, Conclusion 24) (Previous reference: Paris Session, 6th Meeting, Conclusion 18) VOL. 4 z \2th Meeting, Paris, July, 1948. 351 by a non-binominal author and not vaUdly republished by a binonunal author prior to being cited in a specific synonymy and (2) a name which previously had existed only as a manuscript name or as a nomen nudum. Names of genera accidentally introduced into the Uterature in this way were usually Ignored and it was desirable that official sanction should now be given to this practice. THE COMMISSION agreed to recommend :- that words should be inserted in Article 25 to make it clear that a generic name is not to be treated as having l^een published with an indication by virtue only of Its having been published as the generic component of a specific name cited in a synonymy given for a nominal species, and accordingly that a generic name so published does not thereby acquire any status in zoological nomenclature. 37. THE COMMISSION had mider consideration the question of the apphcation to generic names published in generic synonymies of the provisions of Article 30, together nno/ rP'°P°'^^' "" '^^^"^^ ^^«^^*o submitted in Point (W6) in Commission Paper (48)18. It was pointed out that, under taken at the meeting noted in the margin (by which the ruling given in Opmionb was to be incorporated in the ReqlesUsenenc name originally published before 1758 did not acquire any rights under the Law of Priority (Article 25) when after 1758 it was republished in a generic synonymy, for publication in this manner did not constitute either adoption or acceptance by the author by whom the name was so published There remained however the case of manuscript generic names which first appeared in print
Size: 1992px × 1254px
Photo credit: © Book Worm / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., bookcentury1900, bookcollectionbiodiversity, bookpublisherlondon
