. The grammar of ornament . ier and in Salzenberg, reappear at Sta. Sofia; at No. 3,Plate XXVIII., is the foliated St. Andrews cross within acircle, so common as a Eomanesque and Gothic the same frieze is a design repeated with but slight altera-tion 17, from Germany. The curved and foliated branchof No. 4 of the sixth century (Sta. Sofia) is seen reproduced,with slight variation, at No. 11 of the eleventh century (). The toothings of the leaves of No. 19 (Grermany)are almost identical with those of No. 1 (Sta. Sofia); and be-tween all the examples on the last row bu
. The grammar of ornament . ier and in Salzenberg, reappear at Sta. Sofia; at No. 3,Plate XXVIII., is the foliated St. Andrews cross within acircle, so common as a Eomanesque and Gothic the same frieze is a design repeated with but slight altera-tion 17, from Germany. The curved and foliated branchof No. 4 of the sixth century (Sta. Sofia) is seen reproduced,with slight variation, at No. 11 of the eleventh century (). The toothings of the leaves of No. 19 (Grermany)are almost identical with those of No. 1 (Sta. Sofia); and be-tween all the examples on the last row but one (Plate XXVIII.)is to be remarked a generic resemblance in subjects from Grermany, Italy, and Spain, founded on a Byzantine type. The last row of subjects in this plate illustrates more especially the Eomanesque style (Nos. 27and 36), showing the interlaced ornament so affected by the Northern nations, founded mainly on anative type; whilst at No. 35 (St. Denis) we have one instance out of numbers of the reproduction52.
Size: 1219px × 2050px
Photo credit: © Reading Room 2020 / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., bookcentury1800, booksubjectde, booksubjectdecorationandornament
