. Teachers' marks; their variability and standardization. 0 78 15 17 79 15 13 80 32 29 81 13 15 82 12 23 83 15 10 84 9 16 85 17 21 86 . 10 12 87 3 .73 12 88 7 8 89 4 .98 5 90 14 13 91 4 .98 5 92 4 .98 4 93 0 0 5 94 2 .49 1 .32 95 0 0 0 0 96 1 .24 1 .32 97 0 0 0 0 98 1 .24 99 0 0 100 1 .24 Totals 409 317 Median marks. 75 80 77 80 Middle 50% 74-82 75-85 74 Teachers Marks Examining first the distribution and corresponding surface offrequency, Table
. Teachers' marks; their variability and standardization. 0 78 15 17 79 15 13 80 32 29 81 13 15 82 12 23 83 15 10 84 9 16 85 17 21 86 . 10 12 87 3 .73 12 88 7 8 89 4 .98 5 90 14 13 91 4 .98 5 92 4 .98 4 93 0 0 5 94 2 .49 1 .32 95 0 0 0 0 96 1 .24 1 .32 97 0 0 0 0 98 1 .24 99 0 0 100 1 .24 Totals 409 317 Median marks. 75 80 77 80 Middle 50% 74-82 75-85 74 Teachers Marks Examining first the distribution and corresponding surface offrequency, Table 33 and Figure 9, of the marks for the thirty-six schools, we note that the median mark is at 75 in the actualdistribution, and at 77 in the theoretical distribution. Themiddle 50 per cent lie between 74 and 82. Thus it appears that25 per cent of the papers marked 75 bj the regents had been ratedat 82 or above by the teachers. One paper had been rated at100, another at 60, while enough were rated at 80, 85 and 90 toshow modal tendencies for those
Size: 3099px × 807px
Photo credit: © The Reading Room / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., bookcentury1900, bookdecade1910, booksubjectgradingandmarkingstu
