. Carnegie Institution of Washington publication. Analysis of Heteeogeneitt in the Population 297 In the following season (1909), none of the introduced conditions were found in the population in either of the censuses, the only trace being a single de- formed weak female of biotype 13 in the first generation of the season, which did not reappear in the second annual population. In the second generation a small group of isolated males of biotype 6 were present, but were too few in pro- portion to the total population to have any meaning (figs. 98, 99). Evidently something that has happened in


. Carnegie Institution of Washington publication. Analysis of Heteeogeneitt in the Population 297 In the following season (1909), none of the introduced conditions were found in the population in either of the censuses, the only trace being a single de- formed weak female of biotype 13 in the first generation of the season, which did not reappear in the second annual population. In the second generation a small group of isolated males of biotype 6 were present, but were too few in pro- portion to the total population to have any meaning (figs. 98, 99). Evidently something that has happened in the location and in the population has obliterated the introduced stock in a relatively short time and held the state of the population at a fairly constant average, in spite of the disturbances of. Please note that these images are extracted from scanned page images that may have been digitally enhanced for readability - coloration and appearance of these illustrations may not perfectly resemble the original Carnegie Institution of Washington. Washington, Carnegie Institution of Washington


Size: 1664px × 1502px
Photo credit: © Book Worm / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No

Keywords: ., bookauthorcarnegie, bookcentury1900, bookdecade1910, bookyear1918