. Elementary and dental radiography / by Howard Riley Raper . us molar with pulp exposed. Question:Should the tooth be treated, filled and retained inthe mouth, or extracted to make room for the second bicuspid? demonstrates the futility of attempting to treat the tooth—its rootsare almost entirely resorbed despite the fact that there is no succedaneoustooth in the jaw—and shows also that there is no bicuspid to take itsplace. Extraction and bridgework are indicated. Fig. 137 shows two retained temporary up-Tlg. 137. Per cuspids with the permanent cuspids impacted and malposed. 158 DEN
. Elementary and dental radiography / by Howard Riley Raper . us molar with pulp exposed. Question:Should the tooth be treated, filled and retained inthe mouth, or extracted to make room for the second bicuspid? demonstrates the futility of attempting to treat the tooth—its rootsare almost entirely resorbed despite the fact that there is no succedaneoustooth in the jaw—and shows also that there is no bicuspid to take itsplace. Extraction and bridgework are indicated. Fig. 137 shows two retained temporary up-Tlg. 137. Per cuspids with the permanent cuspids impacted and malposed. 158 DENTAL RADIOGRAPHY Fig. 138 shows two retained, primary, lowerTig. 13$. central incisors with no sign of the permanent cen- trals. Age of patient, seventeen. Case—a young man, age twenty-two; with aTigs. 139 and 140. retained, temporary, lower, second molar. The tem-porary tooth was too short to reach its antagonistsin occlusion. For this reason the patient, a dental student, wished tohave it crowned. Before making the crown, a radiograph was taken (
Size: 1518px × 1645px
Photo credit: © Reading Room 2020 / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., book, bookauthorraperhowardriley, bookcentury1900, bookdecade1910
