![](http://www.alamy.com/thumbs/6/7419E74F-029A-463F-9BC5-0ED275444D34/2AJ1XDA.jpg)
Indian Population in the United States and Alaska . E52 Excess of males. E&gg Excess of females. | 1 Less than 100 full-blood Indians In state. EXCESS OF MALES OR FEMALES AMONG INDIANS OF MIXEDBLOOD: ggg Excess of males. fj^JSI Excess of femalos. | | Less than 100 Indians of mixed blood in state. Table 27 INDIAN population: 1910. CLASS. United States. Alaska. Male. Female. Males to 100 females. Male. Female. Males to 100 females. Total 135,133 130,550 12,995 12,336 Full blood 75,66748,15711,309 74,38645,26610,898 11,0491,946 10,3951,941 Mixed blood 100
Indian Population in the United States and Alaska . E52 Excess of males. E&gg Excess of females. | 1 Less than 100 full-blood Indians In state. EXCESS OF MALES OR FEMALES AMONG INDIANS OF MIXEDBLOOD: ggg Excess of males. fj^JSI Excess of femalos. | | Less than 100 Indians of mixed blood in state. Table 27 INDIAN population: 1910. CLASS. United States. Alaska. Male. Female. Males to 100 females. Male. Female. Males to 100 females. Total 135,133 130,550 12,995 12,336 Full blood 75,66748,15711,309 74,38645,26610,898 11,0491,946 10,3951,941 Mixed blood 100 3 Blood not reported .. The greater preponderance of males shown amongthe mixed-bloods than among the full-bloods in theUnited States is probably due in part to the tendencyto report as white, Indian women of mixed blood whoare married to white men. This theory is supportedby a study of the sex distribution of 23,464 childrenunder 5 years of age, presented in Table 28. Table 28 shows that in the case of children under5 years of age the excess of males was somewhatgreater among full-bloods than among mixed-bloods. Table 28 INDIAN CHILDREN UNDER5 YEARS OF AGE: 1910. CLASS. Male. Female. Males to 100 f
Size: 1972px × 1268px
Photo credit: © The Reading Room / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., bookauthordepartme, bookcentury1900, bookdecade1910, bookyear1915