(The) historicity of the resurrection of Jesus . re is another fusillade of attack frora thefield of comparative religion and mythology. This advanceaims at explaining any riven religion from the circumstancesof its environirent. It basts its position entirely on theold Eabylonlan legends which have been studied out of their^ mtiquity within recent years. If its work has succeeded in shaking the faith of some, there are among those who who areled on with its argument a number with Harnack, who maintainfaith only in a spiritual interpretaticn of the Faster mes-sage. These at least will not be s
(The) historicity of the resurrection of Jesus . re is another fusillade of attack frora thefield of comparative religion and mythology. This advanceaims at explaining any riven religion from the circumstancesof its environirent. It basts its position entirely on theold Eabylonlan legends which have been studied out of their^ mtiquity within recent years. If its work has succeeded in shaking the faith of some, there are among those who who areled on with its argument a number with Harnack, who maintainfaith only in a spiritual interpretaticn of the Faster mes-sage. These at least will not be shaken from theirbelief that some manifestation of the risen Clirist was madeto those who speak so unanimously of His appearances, The belief of the e .rly Church - that early body of followers who lived so near the events in questionand many of v^hose number had had close association with those who claimed to have seen the risen Lord - is animportant step in the development of this conviction of this body beyond all question is that. 6. fthe resurrection was a true miracli this point tnr=tfef^ discussion Strauss is very frank, Here then we stand on thatdecisive point where, in the presence of the accounts of,the miraculous resui^rection of Jesus, we either aclcnowledge the inadmissibility of the natural and historical view oft:e life of Jesus, and must consequently retract all thatprecedes, and so give up the whAle undertaking, or pledgeourselves to make out the possibili;ty of the result ofthese accounts, , the origin of the belief of the resurrection of Jesus, without any corresponding miraculous is certain that the early Christians made no distinctionbetween the Easter Message and the Easter Faith. The ap-pearances to the women in John 20:14-18, ^.16;9 and Matt,28:9-10, to the apostles in L^oke 24:36, John 20: 19--^9 and|Mark 16-14, and to the apostles on the road to Emmaus - Luke24:13 f., and to the disciples in Gallilee - Matt. 28:l6,John 21 - speak
Size: 1441px × 1735px
Photo credit: © The Reading Room / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., bookcentury1900, bookdecade1920, bookidthehistorici, bookyear1922
