United States Court of Appeals For the Ninth Circuit . s of the defendant through its train disipatcher,together with the negligence and carelessness of a fel-low-servant or fellow-servants, the negligence of whichsaid defendant through its train dispatcher and fellow-servants or fellow-servants proximately contributing tothe aforesaid collision, injuries and damages, for thereason and on the grounds that there was no substan-tial evidence produced in said cause supporting, or tend-ing to support, the conclusion that defendant, throughits train dispatcher, was guilty of or chargeable withany n
United States Court of Appeals For the Ninth Circuit . s of the defendant through its train disipatcher,together with the negligence and carelessness of a fel-low-servant or fellow-servants, the negligence of whichsaid defendant through its train dispatcher and fellow-servants or fellow-servants proximately contributing tothe aforesaid collision, injuries and damages, for thereason and on the grounds that there was no substan-tial evidence produced in said cause supporting, or tend-ing to support, the conclusion that defendant, throughits train dispatcher, was guilty of or chargeable withany negligence or carelessness which proximately or di-rectly caused or contributed to cause said collision, in-juries aud damages, or any part thereof. That defendant excepts to No. IV of said findings offact and conclusions of law, for the reasons and on the 114 Santa Fe Pacific Railroad Company grounds that there was no substantial evidence pro-duced in said cause supporting, or tending to support,said findings, or any part thereof. v~y\l 0 z ^^ o 1?°. vs. Laurete Holmes. 117 The followiug document marked Plaintiffs Exhibit is a full and true copy of Plaintiffs Exhibit No. 1 here-inbefore mentioned: Plaintiffs Exhibit FE PACIFIC RAILROAD CO. General Reg-ulations for Employees and General Rules, In EffectOctober 22, 1897. I GENERAL NOTICE. It is of the utmost importance that proper rules forthe government of the employees of a railroad companyshould be literally and absolutely enforced, in order tomake such rules efficient. If they cannot or ought notto be enforced, they ought not to exist. OfiSceis or em-ployees whose duty it may be to make or enforce rules,however temporory or unimportant they may seem, shouldkeep this clearly in mind. If in the judgment of anyonewhose duty it is to enforce a rule, such rule cannot orought not to be enforced, he should at once bring it to theattention of those in authority. All employees should be required to be polite and con-side
Size: 1612px × 1550px
Photo credit: © The Reading Room / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., bookauthorunitedst, bookcentury1900, bookdecade1900, bookyear1904
