. California fish and game. Fisheries -- California; Game and game-birds -- California; Fishes -- California; Animal Population Groups; Pêches; Gibier; Poissons. 80 FISH AND GAME COMMISSION. FIkIi Reduction Act complaints were filed in due time and hearings held in East San Pedro, to take testimony in each case. The evidence offered showed that seven companies had violated the fish reduction regulations and orders were subsequently issued, on May 15, 1922, suspending the fish packing license of each company found guilty of exceeding the 25 per cent limit. Three companies later obtained writs o


. California fish and game. Fisheries -- California; Game and game-birds -- California; Fishes -- California; Animal Population Groups; Pêches; Gibier; Poissons. 80 FISH AND GAME COMMISSION. FIkIi Reduction Act complaints were filed in due time and hearings held in East San Pedro, to take testimony in each case. The evidence offered showed that seven companies had violated the fish reduction regulations and orders were subsequently issued, on May 15, 1922, suspending the fish packing license of each company found guilty of exceeding the 25 per cent limit. Three companies later obtained writs of review with an order attached restraining further action suspending operations at their respective plants, and, at the same time, a new organization of leading packers was formed which made the suspending order ineffective in the case of three other companies. No further action was taken nntil. Fig. 2 6. Hauling a seine. the last of June, when the orders suspending the packing licenses of seven companies found guilty of violating the fish reduction regula- tioiis were rescinded by the Commission. During the present summer of 1922 the IMonterey sardine canners again made application to be permitted to use a percentage of the sardines for reduction purposes. A hearing was held hy representatives of the Fish and Game Commision at Monterey and fi-om the evidence submitted it was determined tliat to i)lace a lower percentage limit on the amount of sardines wliicli could be diverted for reduction at Monterey than is granted in the Soutlu^rn Califoi-nia districts placed Monterey canners at an unfair disadvantage, and as it was deemed , fi-om the evidence snl)mitted by canners in Southern Cali-. Please note that these images are extracted from scanned page images that may have been digitally enhanced for readability - coloration and appearance of these illustrations may not perfectly resemble the original California. Dept. of Fish and Game; California. Fish a


Size: 2216px × 1127px
Photo credit: © Book Worm / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No

Keywords: ., bookauthorcaliforniadeptoffishandgame, bookauthorcaliforniafish