. In Superior Court of the County of San Bernardino, State of California. Department One. Cucamonga Vineyard Co. et al., plaintiff vs. San Antonio Water Co., defendant; no. 9187 . ^f^ t.»o F-rm^ stjjr .<£.?. Z *- ^-Z a: tr5 0 = B »*a tmr.* how c i> wor^ they? A» Hiov all averaged betAw«en 400 aiid fJOO fti«.?t. No. I ia atriflo over .^ . Q. ^ at in your opinion ia *>e iSjTipathy or vant of lyapftthybotwoen *hi wt^lla on v>!0 ;5>-acr« tmci tJKi tl;e Lone Star well? A» The)}- are reajxir w-ijllis, fivat is, I Eie/ui not dooijor fromtht ourfaco, but ic^«;r i^.ccn. B^^tit is
. In Superior Court of the County of San Bernardino, State of California. Department One. Cucamonga Vineyard Co. et al., plaintiff vs. San Antonio Water Co., defendant; no. 9187 . ^f^ t.»o F-rm^ stjjr .<£.?. Z *- ^-Z a: tr5 0 = B »*a tmr.* how c i> wor^ they? A» Hiov all averaged betAw«en 400 aiid fJOO fti«.?t. No. I ia atriflo over .^ . Q. ^ at in your opinion ia *>e iSjTipathy or vant of lyapftthybotwoen *hi wt^lla on v>!0 ;5>-acr« tmci tJKi tl;e Lone Star well? A» The)}- are reajxir w-ijllis, fivat is, I Eie/ui not dooijor fromtht ourfaco, but ic^«;r i^.ccn. B^^tit is, tn.^-:,- col* +Jb.« «ur-fiicc fit a lOiit-r «.l:-?V4ttion, apxi ^Tobftbly tuiCCHLMbct&el riih anyStar. TVut I ne er ccuhl bfut what tl ay ufi-scti^d it C« ^.ot in i^i^ur opinion is -ht influertCr* of the oo-acr©tmct ^KllE<«ri i.^:: Lone Stir waile «tfid tiwa^fela on tiHjfuca-mom^jt crot;^ flw? . I they aiact it va^y lit^tls* Probably tboy msuldeffect it if \he vrnter «aa hi^h. Tii-^irt? a divide b«tv/«en tht»o— not fi hif^i divictj, kit eonitttbin^. i-. S
Size: 1291px × 1935px
Photo credit: © Reading Room 2020 / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., bo, bookcentury1900, bookdecade1900, bookidinsuperiorcourto03cuca