Transfer printing on enamels, porcelain and pottery : its origin and development in the United Kingdom . sub judice^ until further evidence isforthcomxing. 3. Simon Fran9ois Ravenet, vide Jean AndreRouquet in his book, LEtat des Arts enAngleterre (1755), and Smith in his Life ofNoUekens. 4. Robert Hancock, vide A. Randall Ballantinein his Robert Hancock and his Works (1885). 5. Dr. J. Wall, vide Joseph MarryatsHistory of Pottery and Porcelain (1850); andJoseph Mayer in his Art of Pottery, and Historyof its Progress in Liverpool. 6. Josiah Holdship, vide Cynthio in TheGentlemans Magazine, of De
Transfer printing on enamels, porcelain and pottery : its origin and development in the United Kingdom . sub judice^ until further evidence isforthcomxing. 3. Simon Fran9ois Ravenet, vide Jean AndreRouquet in his book, LEtat des Arts enAngleterre (1755), and Smith in his Life ofNoUekens. 4. Robert Hancock, vide A. Randall Ballantinein his Robert Hancock and his Works (1885). 5. Dr. J. Wall, vide Joseph MarryatsHistory of Pottery and Porcelain (1850); andJoseph Mayer in his Art of Pottery, and Historyof its Progress in Liverpool. 6. Josiah Holdship, vide Cynthio in TheGentlemans Magazine, of December, 1757. 7. Dr. J. H. Pott, of Berlin, vide AugusteDemmin in his Guide de IAmateur de Faienceet Porcelaine (1863). 8. Harry Baker, vide Dr. Simeon Shaw inhis History of the Staffordshire Potteries(1829 and 1900). 9. Mr. Carver, vide Dr. Simeon Shaw in hisHistory of the Staffordshire Potteries (1829and 1900). 10. Chelsea, \ 11. Birmingham,] per Thos. Laurenson, inthe Liverpool Advertiser of the 11th February,1757, quoted by C. T. Gatty, in his paper onThe Liverpool Potteries (1882). Plate No. Fig. a 2. CUP AND SAUCER, JESUIT CHINA, PAINTEDChinese. I Origin. 12. Bow, per John Bowcocke, quoted byW. Chaffers in his Marks and Monograms(1874), p. 895. 13. Adam Spengler, per Dr. Angst, vide*The Queen, of 6th May, 1905. In starting this enquiry it was hoped to discoverthe origin in a positive sense. That satisfaction isdenied. Nevertheless, the circumstantial evidence isso strong that we can get sufficiently near to thepoint of identification to convince all unbiassed order of procedure will be to take the cases ofplaces and persons, seriatim, as enumerated , examine each claim in the light of the factsacquired, and sum up the whole of the evidence atlast. In doing so any kind of prejudice in favour ofthis or that person or place will be sincerely put aside. The first place on the list is that of Liverpool,which is represented by a solitary claimant. John Sa
Size: 1270px × 1967px
Photo credit: © The Reading Room / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., bookcentury1900, bookdecade1900, bookpublisherlondonchapmanandha
