Annals of the South African Museum = Annale van die Suid-Afrikaanse Museum . e-related characters and are conspecific (as Lufengosaurus huenei Young,1941a). Rozhdestvensky (1966) noted that, judging from the original diagnosisof Young (19416), Gyposaurus sinensis is hardly distinguishable from G. capensis,but that without visual comparisons or more detailed descriptions it is impos-sible to decide the relationship between these two species. Galton (1973, inpress) noted that Gyposaurus sinensis was incorrectly referred to the genusGyposaurus, and may represent a new genus or be based on juvenil
Annals of the South African Museum = Annale van die Suid-Afrikaanse Museum . e-related characters and are conspecific (as Lufengosaurus huenei Young,1941a). Rozhdestvensky (1966) noted that, judging from the original diagnosisof Young (19416), Gyposaurus sinensis is hardly distinguishable from G. capensis,but that without visual comparisons or more detailed descriptions it is impos-sible to decide the relationship between these two species. Galton (1973, inpress) noted that Gyposaurus sinensis was incorrectly referred to the genusGyposaurus, and may represent a new genus or be based on juveniles of eitherLufengosaurus or Yimnanosaurus. Gyposaurus sinensis should not be referredto the genus Gyposaurus (or Anchisaurus) because of the following anatomicalfeatures (Table 3): 1. Centra of posterior dorsal vertebrae are proportionally high with acentral length to height ratio of 1,1 (Fig. 90). 2. Anterior process of ilium is short and triangular (Fig. 10C). 3. Subacetabular part of pubis is broken but originally this region was 148 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM. n <. c
Size: 1830px × 1365px
Photo credit: © The Reading Room / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., bookcentury1800, bookdecade1890, booki, booksubjectnaturalhistory
