. Elementary and dental radiography / by Howard Riley Raper . Fig. 259. Same as Fig. 258 after removal of the fluid contents and upper wall of the cyst,showing the second bicuspid erupting into place. (Radiograph by Pancoast, of Philadelphia.) Pennsylvania, but came for examination on the same day. They weretwo women patients of about the same age, both wearing full upper arti-ficial dentures and partial lower ones, and both suffering from a similarcharacter of pain, the only difference being that in one patient the painwas located on the left side of the lower jaw, while the other was on ther
. Elementary and dental radiography / by Howard Riley Raper . Fig. 259. Same as Fig. 258 after removal of the fluid contents and upper wall of the cyst,showing the second bicuspid erupting into place. (Radiograph by Pancoast, of Philadelphia.) Pennsylvania, but came for examination on the same day. They weretwo women patients of about the same age, both wearing full upper arti-ficial dentures and partial lower ones, and both suffering from a similarcharacter of pain, the only difference being that in one patient the painwas located on the left side of the lower jaw, while the other was on theright side of the lower jaw. Physical examination revealed the fact thatthe right cervical lymphatic glands in one of the patients were slightlyenlarged. The history obtained of the cases did not aid in patients claimed that the molar teeth on each side had been ex-tracted years ago. X-rays were made of the jaws with the followingresults: Fig. 260 was made from the patient whose cervical glands were 226 DENTAL RADIOGRAPHY. Fig. 260. Myelosarcoma of the lower jaw. In appearance it resembles a bone cyst somewhat.(Radiograph by Pancoast, of Philadelphia.) enlarged. The picture shows a breaking down of the bone, with the twodark shadows indicating abnormal density of the bone in some this appearance, together with the slight enlargement of. the glands,the case was diagnosed as myelosarcoma. A microscopic examination;ofthe tissue removed, confirmed the diagnosis. I do not reproduce the radiograph of the other case because the printI have is not clear enough to permit of a good halftone reproduction. Theprint before me shows fairly well three impacted lower teeth, one a rudi-mentary bicuspid, the others a second and third molar. THE USES OE THE RADIOGRAPH IN DENTISTRY 22; • Dr. Cryer says: There seemed to l)e very little difference in thesetwu cases from the history and physical examination, but the wonderfulwork of the X-rays revealed a very great dissi
Size: 1509px × 1656px
Photo credit: © Reading Room 2020 / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., book, bookauthorraperhowardriley, bookcentury1900, bookdecade1910
