Byzantine and Romanesque architecture . 30 Hfy 2L So 70 Fig. 27. Tfed: font. Fig. 28. 124 LATER BYZANTINE BUILDINGS [ch. ix eastern piers (Fig. 28) are not isolated but are joinedto the walls of the sanctuary, and the north, south, andwest arms of the cross are filled with galleries carriedon arcades and vaulting as at S. Irene. Above them,however, the cruciform plan is perfect. In the earliers. Maria Kalender Hane Djami (S. Maria Diaconissa) thesame attachment of the two eastern piers of the domeoccurs, though the apse itself has disappeared. In theThe Panto- triple church of S. Saviour Panto
Byzantine and Romanesque architecture . 30 Hfy 2L So 70 Fig. 27. Tfed: font. Fig. 28. 124 LATER BYZANTINE BUILDINGS [ch. ix eastern piers (Fig. 28) are not isolated but are joinedto the walls of the sanctuary, and the north, south, andwest arms of the cross are filled with galleries carriedon arcades and vaulting as at S. Irene. Above them,however, the cruciform plan is perfect. In the earliers. Maria Kalender Hane Djami (S. Maria Diaconissa) thesame attachment of the two eastern piers of the domeoccurs, though the apse itself has disappeared. In theThe Panto- triple church of S. Saviour Pantocrator (Zeirek KilisseDjamisi) the dome piers are isolated, and the cruciformplan is complete (Fig, 29). Here too the columns of thedome are obviously of Turkish workmanship, which atfirst sight is somewhat surprising. From Gyllius, how-ever, we learn that the dome in his time rested on columnsof fine granite, which are no doubt now doing duty inone of the great post-conquest As a rule the rounded surfaces of all domes, subsidiary of domes ^s Well as prin
Size: 1914px × 1306px
Photo credit: © The Reading Room / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., bookauthorjacksont, bookcentury1900, bookdecade1910, bookyear1913
