. .-DEC ...-NOV \2' JANUARY NOV-JAN COMBINED Fig. 156. Concentrations of Blue whales from November to January 1928-9 (from Kemp and Bennett, 1932). Fig. 157 shows the phosphate values for the South Georgia November survey of 1930. Mr Hart, in the report already referred to (1934), has published the phytoplankton re- sults of this survey also. The disagreement of the distribution of the phytoplankton at the time of the survey with the phosphate values is not so marked as in the January- February survey just discussed, but the agreement is by no means a close one. However, the correlation betwee
. .-DEC ...-NOV \2' JANUARY NOV-JAN COMBINED Fig. 156. Concentrations of Blue whales from November to January 1928-9 (from Kemp and Bennett, 1932). Fig. 157 shows the phosphate values for the South Georgia November survey of 1930. Mr Hart, in the report already referred to (1934), has published the phytoplankton re- sults of this survey also. The disagreement of the distribution of the phytoplankton at the time of the survey with the phosphate values is not so marked as in the January- February survey just discussed, but the agreement is by no means a close one. However, the correlation between phosphate and/>H values, shown in Fig. 160, is very marked, and again leads one to regard the phosphate values as a good guide to the phytoplankton production over a little time in the past. A chart of the pH distribution is shown in Fig. 158, where the area of low/>H values to the north-east of the island is seen to corre- spond with the area of high phosphate values. Fig. 159 shows the distribution of Fin and
Size: 2911px × 1717px
Photo credit: © The Bookworm Collection / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., bookcentury1900, booksubjectocean, booksubjectscientificexpediti
