. In Superior Court of the County of San Bernardino, State of California. Department One. Cucamonga Vineyard Co. et al., plaintiff vs. San Antonio Water Co., defendant; no. 9187 . c, Kowbig in tl^-t ciuostion?x:ife Oovrt: Obi^sction 07;;rpiteed. intjrviiicrte c?;t*>i« It-«i>ui(i havs* no afoet unltiSft y«.\ ir»cr«.iori. ;. ^«V wuuir^ tf f> fivM-Bion yf t t trytOf- f/O-; ontJ fc-rk s^ffoct t-o fit- :ai *^. .tiK, Mi^y foor/v thuri :.tt xx. cotiLuiUsd to flowin at« ct-waa? ___. 1234 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 r 13HI 2:: •- < u. U T. J7i< « -^ 5 0 ?w, and in t t caee it would
. In Superior Court of the County of San Bernardino, State of California. Department One. Cucamonga Vineyard Co. et al., plaintiff vs. San Antonio Water Co., defendant; no. 9187 . c, Kowbig in tl^-t ciuostion?x:ife Oovrt: Obi^sction 07;;rpiteed. intjrviiicrte c?;t*>i« It-«i>ui(i havs* no afoet unltiSft y«.\ ir»cr«.iori. ;. ^«V wuuir^ tf f> fivM-Bion yf t t trytOf- f/O-; ontJ fc-rk s^ffoct t-o fit- :ai *^. .tiK, Mi^y foor/v thuri :.tt xx. cotiLuiUsd to flowin at« ct-waa? ___. 1234 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 r 13HI 2:: •- < u. U T. J7i< « -^ 5 0 ?w, and in t t caee it would jvithoutiny doubt affect the flow on the other chu^iicl, Q. Why CIO you ke-^p ^Aitling t at ontitruction there? Is itbocauBo you are reluctant, to ndmit t>iAt you know it wouldriH&f::uct It? A. No, Sir; I kmp thiit obislpacriion t:iora becauatt it was»*e beiov; v/aile 4 stKi 14, Q. I au not asking }0u anyUiirig abc. x W6 l« 4 and 14, butdoin^>: my ut*«o{it to carry you from t. ore. , Am I havtt n it fiany tiiiieu t;at in i;;Jaki;i^ ;3uch diver-Bumn tlwt obstructioTiB hav«j boon reaovau, anri I Jty« aetsnojaiiy tiiitiE ny div^-rtjija,-; ,uo wi,t(5r fr:^a onii fciaacn U^at it hari croaood a frear flew m XI 4- and voin to Lhe daraag© of t^*.© oth^r bran
Size: 1286px × 1944px
Photo credit: © Reading Room 2020 / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., bo, bookcentury1900, bookdecade1900, bookidinsuperiorcourto03cuca
