. Oral sepsis in its relationship to systemic disease . evere trauma. Two of the root canals had been filled just previous to the taking ofthe roentgenograms. fection which simulate those caused by infection. Such,however, are not common, and are not the usual sourceof contention. The chief source of divergent opinionconcerns whether or not the shadows admittedly due toold abscesses or granulomata can be interpreted as proofof active infection. Many dentists believe that certainshadows are proof of past infection, but do not believethey can be looked upon as evidence of active d
. Oral sepsis in its relationship to systemic disease . evere trauma. Two of the root canals had been filled just previous to the taking ofthe roentgenograms. fection which simulate those caused by infection. Such,however, are not common, and are not the usual sourceof contention. The chief source of divergent opinionconcerns whether or not the shadows admittedly due toold abscesses or granulomata can be interpreted as proofof active infection. Many dentists believe that certainshadows are proof of past infection, but do not believethey can be looked upon as evidence of active dentists take the extreme view that a shadowmeans sepsis only when there is pain, tenderness of 111<•tooth, or other clinical manifestation to corroborate thediagnosis, and often disregard roentgen findings, which ALVEOLAR ABSCESSES 51 as frequently happens, offer the only possible means bywhich root sepsis can be definitely proved. Unanimityof opinion upon the interpretation of dental roentgeno-grams is naturally of fundamental importance to both.
Size: 1802px × 1386px
Photo credit: © Reading Room 2020 / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., bookcentury1900, bookdecade1910, bookpublis, booksubjectdentistry
