Studies from the laboratories of the Deptof Surgery . FiK. 33 v\k. ^A Fig. 33 (Caic 4).—July 27, 1921, marked subperiosteal bone proliferation; appiarance some-what cuggcfts beginning !>c(juc!ilration fornuition. Fig. 34 ^Casc 4).—Sept. 19, 1921, marked subperiosteal bone prodiiclion; no signs oftcqucttration; general condition satisfactory. 39 mesial surface, below the extensor tendon. Carrel tubes andDakin gauze were inserted along the side of the femur, butnone were placed in the medullary canal. Culture revealed a pure growth of Staphylococcus aureus. Result.—The child was discharged fr
Studies from the laboratories of the Deptof Surgery . FiK. 33 v\k. ^A Fig. 33 (Caic 4).—July 27, 1921, marked subperiosteal bone proliferation; appiarance some-what cuggcfts beginning !>c(juc!ilration fornuition. Fig. 34 ^Casc 4).—Sept. 19, 1921, marked subperiosteal bone prodiiclion; no signs oftcqucttration; general condition satisfactory. 39 mesial surface, below the extensor tendon. Carrel tubes andDakin gauze were inserted along the side of the femur, butnone were placed in the medullary canal. Culture revealed a pure growth of Staphylococcus aureus. Result.—The child was discharged from the hospital onthe sixty-fourth day, with a normal temperature. The inci-sion was completely healed; but there was a small sinus fromthe mesial stab wound. Three months after discharge, forceps were inserted anda small cortical sequestrum removed. As can be seen by theintervening roentgenograms there has been marked reactionand new bone production. I am convinced that if in thiscase the femur had been opened wide and packed, an entireseques
Size: 1047px × 2388px
Photo credit: © The Reading Room / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., bookcentury1900, bookdecade1910, bookpublishernewyork, bookyear19
