. Bulletin of zoological nomenclature. 264 1 iUernational Commission on Zoological Nomencl<Uure. (2) that a Recommandation in terms similar to those specified in (1) above but relating to trivial names should be inserted in Article 14. Article 23 (proposed clarification in certain respects) PURCHASE5 26 [;IAr 1360. 17. THE COMMISSION had under consideration the following papers relating to the use of parentheses (round brackets) in cases where subgeneric names are cited in addition to generic names or the status of a tri^'ial name is altered in a given genus. (a) a request received from Dr.
. Bulletin of zoological nomenclature. 264 1 iUernational Commission on Zoological Nomencl<Uure. (2) that a Recommandation in terms similar to those specified in (1) above but relating to trivial names should be inserted in Article 14. Article 23 (proposed clarification in certain respects) PURCHASE5 26 [;IAr 1360. 17. THE COMMISSION had under consideration the following papers relating to the use of parentheses (round brackets) in cases where subgeneric names are cited in addition to generic names or the status of a tri^'ial name is altered in a given genus. (a) a request received from Dr. C. F. W. Muesebeck () for a ruling on the interpretation of Article 23 in cases where a species is originally described as being both in a genus and in a subgenus and later the subgenus is elevated to generic rank and the species is transferred to the genus so erected (file (S.) 128) (see Muesebeck, 1945, Bull. zool. No)ne)icl., 1 : 92); (b) a request received from Professor R. Chester Hughes () for a ruling on the interpretation of Ai'ticle 23 in relation to the use of parentheses (round brackets) when citmg the name of an author of a subspecific trivial name when that name appears in conjunction with the same generic name but not in the same relationship thereto as when origmally pubUshed (file (S.)129) (see Hughes, 1945, Bull, zool. Nomenc., 1 : 91-92); (c) a note on the above cases submitted by the Secretary in Point (44) in Commission Paper ,(48)15. THE COMMISSION agreed to recommend :— (1) that iVrticle 23 should be redrafted, so far as necessary, to make it clear that the provisions of that Article apply only to the case of a species or subspecies which is originally described as belonging to one nominal genus but later is transferred to another nominal genus, and therefore that it is irrelevant for the purposes of Article 23 whetlier a species or subspecies, when first described, in addition to being placed in a genus was placed also in a subge
Size: 1959px × 1276px
Photo credit: © Book Worm / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., bookcentury1900, bookcollectionbiodiversity, bookpublisherlondon
