. The Montreal law reports [microform]. Law reports, digests, etc; Law; Jurisprudence; Droit. t â¢'i V A 100 MOlfTEEAL I»4W REPORTS. '^- â pi-'I .* â¢. tWMjt, thu oontn^'liMlf muit b« «tamin«d. It U t printed form mad« by Mr. ChopU-au for the purpose of his own bttsinoss, snd in accordancw with the w»ai known rule of con»trto«l|pn must, where doubtful, bo construed agwinst him. By ii ke furnishos o Nafo to b« paid for acofding to the conditions cndorsod upon th*> a«r.«em«nt, »"«1^ ' bills the insolvent as for goods sold and delivered. The property is not to pass until the
. The Montreal law reports [microform]. Law reports, digests, etc; Law; Jurisprudence; Droit. t â¢'i V A 100 MOlfTEEAL I»4W REPORTS. '^- â pi-'I .* â¢. tWMjt, thu oontn^'liMlf muit b« «tamin«d. It U t printed form mad« by Mr. ChopU-au for the purpose of his own bttsinoss, snd in accordancw with the w»ai known rule of con»trto«l|pn must, where doubtful, bo construed agwinst him. By ii ke furnishos o Nafo to b« paid for acofding to the conditions cndorsod upon th*> a«r.«em«nt, »"«1^ ' bills the insolvent as for goods sold and delivered. The property is not to pass until the total price has beenjitid. In default of payment within i month, the safe osn be tikm away by him without legal proceedings. The 'insoivents bind themselves to pay in goods, and those goods are only to bo delivered on demand. The account itself shows that within the mouth nothiljg^as paid, (^ly $ within a year. No demand for ^foods was jiroved, not any default of the insolv^^nt to deliver goods, and the r^Apondent'did not eiertiise his right to remove,/ the safe at any time. His position. thfin^fOre, is that h6/. bad sold the safe, and Md allowed the month to elaj^sei without exercising hirright to resume ttossession of the aame. His only other right was to got ^/ayment in goods, and for this a detoand was necessary, »aid nam^ provl'd. The endorwitio^j too, as requiring a demand, must, bo taken as/t^ifying the conditions as tb the prop<^rty passing/otherwistj the respondent would have it in his powjjr to prevent the proper£y ever passing to the pur- ler, and this by abstaining irom demanding the last few dollars worth of goods. i' This agreement. It is submitted, did not put him in any stronger position than Arts. 1548 and 1644 of .the Civil Code, which'Iprovide that in the case of movables, the right of dissolution by reason of non-payment of pri^ecm only be exercised whilst the thing remains in the pd»efe- sioQ of the buyer wi
Size: 987px × 2532px
Photo credit: © The Book Worm / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., books, booksubjectdroit, booksubjectjurisprudence, booksubjectlaw
