Annual report of the North Carolina Agricultural Experiment Station . mpact rhizomorphic strands (Figs. 12 and 13). Peri-thecia were produced in these strands in abundance, being occasionally pro-duced on single short branches (Fig. 14). Small continuous or 1-septateconidia were also produced in abundance on short fertile hyphae (Figs. 15 and16). Considered alone, the habit on this medium would place the conidialstage of Neocosmospora in the Stilbaceae. To these points of difference as brought out in my own cultures I may addthat Smith failed to secure inoculations when the ascigerous fungus w
Annual report of the North Carolina Agricultural Experiment Station . mpact rhizomorphic strands (Figs. 12 and 13). Peri-thecia were produced in these strands in abundance, being occasionally pro-duced on single short branches (Fig. 14). Small continuous or 1-septateconidia were also produced in abundance on short fertile hyphae (Figs. 15 and16). Considered alone, the habit on this medium would place the conidialstage of Neocosmospora in the Stilbaceae. To these points of difference as brought out in my own cultures I may addthat Smith failed to secure inoculations when the ascigerous fungus was used,though the parasitism of the internal fungus has never been brought to ques-tion. His words are: 114 THIRTY-SECOND ANNUAL REPORT, 1909. Cowpea inoculations failed with the fungus derived from ascospores of thecowpea fungus. Nine large pots were used, but all of the 170 plants remainedfree from disease directly attributable to the Neocosmospora, although underobservation for many months. These were soil inoculations, and an abun-dance of the fungus was
Size: 2873px × 870px
Photo credit: © The Reading Room / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., bookauth, bookcentury1900, bookdecade1900, booksubjectagriculture
