. The Montreal law reports [microform]. Law reports, digests, etc; Law; Jurisprudence; Droit. G~-COUB!^ OF QUSBN'Hi BXNOH. j>re8ented themBelyes at the, establishment, they wei!*e , Jiospitably received and lodged for the nighV and were IftJSlta lIJ^ .' permitted to spend t^e whole evening aldn^ with their daughter. They w<^e told that'the defendants only de- sired td resplsct Miss Morissettd^s wishes, and that if she gave the slightest intimation that she desired to leave the establishn|,ent, not the slightest obstacle "wonld be put in her Way. T^y were also informed that while tfc


. The Montreal law reports [microform]. Law reports, digests, etc; Law; Jurisprudence; Droit. G~-COUB!^ OF QUSBN'Hi BXNOH. j>re8ented themBelyes at the, establishment, they wei!*e , Jiospitably received and lodged for the nighV and were IftJSlta lIJ^ .' permitted to spend t^e whole evening aldn^ with their daughter. They w<^e told that'the defendants only de- sired td resplsct Miss Morissettd^s wishes, and that if she gave the slightest intimation that she desired to leave the establishn|,ent, not the slightest obstacle "wonld be put in her Way. T^y were also informed that while tfcey w;ere under the defendants* roof they were expected |o lespect Miss Morissette^s wishes, and that she would be proteidt- ed from any attempt to remove her by force. On'tne morning of his^epaTture, l^fore leaving the house, the petitioner seized his daughter and endeavored to carry'her o£P by force, notwithstanding her energetic resistance and her repeated cries for help, but was'prevented in this at- tempt by tv^o ojL the directors ot the institution, i^ho made him unhand Miss Morissette. ^s soon as, sh^veas ' liberated Mjiss Morissetti^ fled to avother part 6fi:he house <and repeat^ her emphatic/desire to remain against her' ^father's wis^i^. ⦠, r ⢠⢠- " ^^ At'the trial the youn^^)adyi who^reach^dhtr nineteeilth , ' year during th^ pendenpy of the piipceedingsfvwas «xapi-« ined at some'length presiding judge, apd'declared-. in'the most unequiv^ocaL t^rttis that she was perfectly free to go wh^.sW liked, and fhali^ wa^%er 0W9 wi|ni^ remain with, the defendants. â,» * V; â¢Lei^i^ U0W examine^the law which is applicable to t)),e foregoing S9t of fSftcts. â ^:' /,*./; ^Jv < I.â^Th'e first prp^sitionwhlcb fixe appellants submit is that um)n the writ of habeas corpus, the only qudstibn ' which cJald be tri^d- was whether Miss Morissette had ' been confined ojr Restrained of her liberty against her will/ It was not competent' for the C


Size: 2247px × 1112px
Photo credit: © The Book Worm / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No

Keywords: ., books, booksubjectdroit, booksubjectjurisprudence, booksubjectlaw