. The Montreal law reports [microform]. Law reports, digests, etc; Law; Jurisprudence; Droit. -^!^^'''^-^*.j(~^^rt-^'- ^"t'^p'y^iKTm^ -"^HiT* W^^W^"'''^'"'^'^'^^'^'^''W'^ '⢠f 180 lONTBKAL IWlUCPOilTS. IMO. .A yndMjr. Ohsnbi J> llr- ⢠?1 / I 164 ©xpeuBe«/oT freight, nledicial attcndnnco, and articled MontmJ de8tK>y«4, sttould bo allaWed. After a careful examiim- ^». ^.^^ ^^ th/whole ca««^, tWa Court will not disturb the t^erhapa i/ the judgment of the Court be- low had been the oth^r way, there might have been th« same dialnolination
. The Montreal law reports [microform]. Law reports, digests, etc; Law; Jurisprudence; Droit. -^!^^'''^-^*.j(~^^rt-^'- ^"t'^p'y^iKTm^ -"^HiT* W^^W^"'''^'"'^'^'^^'^'^''W'^ '⢠f 180 lONTBKAL IWlUCPOilTS. IMO. .A yndMjr. Ohsnbi J> llr- ⢠?1 / I 164 ©xpeuBe«/oT freight, nledicial attcndnnco, and articled MontmJ de8tK>y«4, sttould bo allaWed. After a careful examiim- ^». ^.^^ ^^ th/whole ca««^, tWa Court will not disturb the t^erhapa i/ the judgment of the Court be- low had been the oth^r way, there might have been th« same dialnolination on the part of this Court to disturb the judgment. Tl^e/appeal is therefore dismissed. ' I Judgment confirmed. Ji»^, BranchLd if Bfiuset, for appellants. tlkirk OoM/ for/res^ndent. r. K.). / / . June 26,1889. Coram Dowoii, Oh. J., Tkssieb, Cross, Baby, Boss4, JJ. ⢠LA MISSION DE LA GRANDE LIGNE et al., {Defendants in Court befoit^) Appellants; AND BOMUALD MORISSETTE, {Petitioner for habeas corpus in Court below.) i Eespondent. BiAras Corpus^ Appeal fromrjvdument of/the Superior Court â â i::' . V âJurisdiction. / â ,?â â¢â ;'; ':: â ⢠â / : - ' - J Hm*:âThat the Superior Court «nd the judg|!<8 thereof havinR concur. «|nt jurisdiction with the Court of QueAn'a Bench in matters of habeuK corpus ad mt^i(^endum, there is ifto appeal to, the Court of J Queen's Beuch slttinR in appeal from the judgment of the Su^rior Court, or of a judgei thereof, in such matters. Appeal from a judgment of pe Superior Court, ^istirict of Iberrille (Charlajjd, J.), in/chambers, Jan. IT, 1889. i^ The judgment of the Court below was as follows:â i â¦' Ayant entendu les parties par leurs avocats respedift, tant atl mferite que sur la qtotion to quash Aqb dfefendeur^ I I I LI I I II I I III ..â..Mil nil IM I I I I II I IIIMLIIMII I Ill I m Ill III I I II MIMM.!!. Please note that these images are extracted from scanned page images that may have been digit
Size: 2919px × 856px
Photo credit: © The Book Worm / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., books, booksubjectdroit, booksubjectjurisprudence, booksubjectlaw
