. Florists' review [microform]. Floriculture. 108 The Florists^ Review Apbil 2, 1914. Our Motto: Tho BEST tho Markot Affords. CHA8. 8CHWAKE & CO., inc. Horticultural ? Importors and Exportors 90-92 WEST BROADWAY, NEW YORK NOW READYs Hohmann's Lily of the Valley Sample cases, per 1000, . ... . $ Lil. Giflranteum 7/9-iii., 300 per case, . . . S/lO-in., 225 per case, Mention The Berlew when yon write. properly taken into consideration. (Kentucky Court of Appeals, Crutcher & Co. vs. Elliott, 13 Kentucky Law Reporter 592.) - < - • / In the case of Phillips" vs.'Term
. Florists' review [microform]. Floriculture. 108 The Florists^ Review Apbil 2, 1914. Our Motto: Tho BEST tho Markot Affords. CHA8. 8CHWAKE & CO., inc. Horticultural ? Importors and Exportors 90-92 WEST BROADWAY, NEW YORK NOW READYs Hohmann's Lily of the Valley Sample cases, per 1000, . ... . $ Lil. Giflranteum 7/9-iii., 300 per case, . . . S/lO-in., 225 per case, Mention The Berlew when yon write. properly taken into consideration. (Kentucky Court of Appeals, Crutcher & Co. vs. Elliott, 13 Kentucky Law Reporter 592.) - < - • / In the case of Phillips" vs.'Termil- lion, 91 Illinois Appellate. C9iH-t Re-' ports 133, it was decided that the fact j that a purchaser of seeds was a tenant; on shares and sowed them on the leased; land did not affect his right to"recover,' as damages for breach of warranty, the full indemnity which it was-the object of the contract to secure. Such a con- tract, the court held, inures to the beil6- fit of the landlord as. well-as. of. the i tenant. In a recent case on this samei point, it was held by the Washington! Supreme Court that the landlQrd ^may! join his tenant in bringing tjie ' (Fuhrman vs. Interior Warehouse C(^.,j 116 Pacific Reporter 666.) " ' , Before the Seed' is Sown. ' i When the purchaser discovers the in- ferior quality of the seed before sow- ing the same^ but elects to retain it, his remedy, according to the Nebraska Su- preme Court, is a claim for any excess of the contract price over the market value of the seed received. (Dunn vs. Bushnell, 88 Northwestern Reporter 693.) This same rule has been applied by the Georgia Supreme Court in the case of Americus Grocery Co. vs. Brack- ett, 46 Southeastern Reporter 657.) Applying the principle that a seller is not liable for consequences of a breach of warranty which he could not have foreseen, it has been held by the New York Supreme Court that if a seller of seed did not know that the buyer intended to mix them with other s
Size: 1285px × 1945px
Photo credit: © Library Book Collection / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., bookcentury1900, bookdecad, booksubjectfloriculture, bookyear1912
