The treatment of fractures . / / .,.J r Shaft of humerus. iVyttfffD J. Lower humeral epiphysis and \\^W\/\S^ / bits from the diaphysis. / Capitellum. /// Fig-. 212.—Separation of the lower humeral epiphysis. Child nine years of age. Separa-tion reduced. Capitellum and epiphysis distinctly seen in the lateral view. Internal angulartin splint shown. This is a not uncommon accident. It occurs usually in chil-dren under ten years old. There is no change in the relationsof the three bony points. It somewhat resembles transverse 174 FRACTURES OF THE HUMERUS fracture above the condyles. The diagnosis


The treatment of fractures . / / .,.J r Shaft of humerus. iVyttfffD J. Lower humeral epiphysis and \\^W\/\S^ / bits from the diaphysis. / Capitellum. /// Fig-. 212.—Separation of the lower humeral epiphysis. Child nine years of age. Separa-tion reduced. Capitellum and epiphysis distinctly seen in the lateral view. Internal angulartin splint shown. This is a not uncommon accident. It occurs usually in chil-dren under ten years old. There is no change in the relationsof the three bony points. It somewhat resembles transverse 174 FRACTURES OF THE HUMERUS fracture above the condyles. The diagnosis is made upon thefollowing points : The age of the individual ; the history ofthe accident; the existence of abnormal mobility at a very lowlevel on the humeral shaft; anteroposterior mobility very Olecranon fossa. Interna] portion ofepiphysis. Ulna. — -— __. Humeral epiphysis and—. bits from the diaphy-sis. — - Capitellnm. — - Radial epiphysis. — Radius. Fig. 213.—Separation of the lower epiphysis of the humerus, after union. Anteropos-terior view. This figure illustrates the fact that the epiphysis does not include the condylesof the humerus (X-ray tracing).


Size: 1167px × 2142px
Photo credit: © The Reading Room / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No

Keywords: ., bookcentury1900, bookdecade1900, booksubjectfractur, bookyear1901