Comparative physiognomy; or, Resemblances between men and animals . ufacturing process is well described. It would seem as if thewriter intended that his own two charming productions shouldhe taken as illustrations of the principle that the head mayhe derived from one parent and the face from the other. Asthe character is always found to follow the phrenologicaldevelopment, Vitellius and Wilson, having changed heads,must be described thus. First, Yitellius: A man remarka-ble fm- talent, purity, and elevation of character; a pattern ofrolence, of enlarged and liberal views, a zealous friendof t
Comparative physiognomy; or, Resemblances between men and animals . ufacturing process is well described. It would seem as if thewriter intended that his own two charming productions shouldhe taken as illustrations of the principle that the head mayhe derived from one parent and the face from the other. Asthe character is always found to follow the phrenologicaldevelopment, Vitellius and Wilson, having changed heads,must be described thus. First, Yitellius: A man remarka-ble fm- talent, purity, and elevation of character; a pattern ofrolence, of enlarged and liberal views, a zealous friendof the p -or; who lived, like Oberlin, for the human race. Inhis phrsi< gnomical judgment of Yitellius, the writer exclaims :What a beastly lace! how sensual and gluttonous! whattyranny and severity! How much of the base robber andmurderer are seen in that countenance! how savage and howrepulsh e I But, as the head of this beastly Koman emperor PREFACE. 9 is turned over to the Rev. Dr. Wilson, this description of char-acter must go with it. We have presented above
Size: 1437px × 1738px
Photo credit: © The Reading Room / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., bookcentury1800, bookdecade1850, bookpubl, booksubjectphysiognomy
