. The chemist and druggist [electronic resource]. experience we have got around the currentMedicines Act, it might be better to try to firm upthe guidance rather than messing with the Act[and decriminalising errors].Hilary DCruz: But the Medicines Act is underreview and it would be safer for pharmacy tomake sure that single dispensing errors areexcluded from the law. Guidance is just that -guidance. In my view youve got to change thelaw. In the meantime your professional bodiesneed to lobby fiercely to ensure this guidance isused appropriately. David Reissner: I think squeezing inparliamentary
. The chemist and druggist [electronic resource]. experience we have got around the currentMedicines Act, it might be better to try to firm upthe guidance rather than messing with the Act[and decriminalising errors].Hilary DCruz: But the Medicines Act is underreview and it would be safer for pharmacy tomake sure that single dispensing errors areexcluded from the law. Guidance is just that -guidance. In my view youve got to change thelaw. In the meantime your professional bodiesneed to lobby fiercely to ensure this guidance isused appropriately. David Reissner: I think squeezing inparliamentary time for legislation changes isgoing to be quite difficult. We have a newgovernment with quite a heavy legislationtimetable so logistically it will be quite difficult todo. Instead I would make representations to theattorney general who is responsible for the would say that this statement doesnt do thejob and then say I wanted the CPS to say itwouldnt bring a prosecution without consultingthe regulator. Do we need to look to thepharmacy p
Size: 1159px × 2157px
Photo credit: © The Reading Room / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., bookcentury1800, bookdecade185, booksubjectpharmacy, bookyear1859
