. The Montreal law reports [microform]. Law reports, digests, etc; Law; Jurisprudence; Droit. \ if . ','"'â (»⢠''r i J'* li i* "IB,?'. iMe. MiMiond«i» c^ted Onuidt Ligna MoriM«tt«. \ MOMTBBAL LAW BBP0BT8. f â â - ⢠particular case a minor is sufllicieiitly developed and edu- to claim such a right even in spites of parental, wishes. A minor can, under the provisions of our Cod(% become emancipated from parental control on his own de- mand b]K any Gotirt on the advic^ of a family conuf appeal in this case has not been questioned by the respondent, the appellants deem it advisab
. The Montreal law reports [microform]. Law reports, digests, etc; Law; Jurisprudence; Droit. \ if . ','"'â (»⢠''r i J'* li i* "IB,?'. iMe. MiMiond«i» c^ted Onuidt Ligna MoriM«tt«. \ MOMTBBAL LAW BBP0BT8. f â â - ⢠particular case a minor is sufllicieiitly developed and edu- to claim such a right even in spites of parental, wishes. A minor can, under the provisions of our Cod(% become emancipated from parental control on his own de- mand b]K any Gotirt on the advic^ of a family conuf appeal in this case has not been questioned by the respondent, the appellants deem it advisable to say a' word on the subject, especially as the learned Judge in the Oonrt below assumed to render the judgment a chambers instead of rendering it as a judgment of the Gourt. Under articles 104*7 and 1048 of the Code of Oiyil Procedure, after the return of the writ, and after the regular trial of ywritte^ issues in- cluding contestation,' answer, articuUtion of facts, in- scriptions for proof and for final hearing on the merits, it is obvious that any judgment rendei-ed in the case must be a judgment of the Court. In â¢the cases of Barlow Sf .Kennedy (VI h. C! J. 268) and BeJina v. Hi^l (8 Q. L. B. ' 186), stich judgments were considered to be susceptible of appeal and review respectivelv, the appellant in the former case being the defendant in the proceedip^ on hflheas corpus, and in the latle/ the petitioner for habeas, cofpui} The interest of the present appellants is suffici- ently obvious. The judgment finds that they have been guilty .of illegally detaining tho child and of assaulting the father, arid if this part/of the judgment were allowed to be re$ ad^udieata against them^ they might be respon- sible in damages on these grounds. Again, they are con- demned* to pay all the petitionerls costs, and thfs alone, 7 in a question of ibis pad whibh involves a principle, would justify this apnfeal \ Dttt apart ffom tftoao oonaidotationo the opp^l
Size: 2293px × 1090px
Photo credit: © The Book Worm / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., books, booksubjectdroit, booksubjectjurisprudence, booksubjectlaw
