. The United States of America, complainant, v. the Union Pacific Railroad Company : the Oregon Short Line Railroad [et al.] defendants. Evidence and proceedings before the special examiner . fadvantage of exception to the manifold insufficiencies of said answer,for replication thereunto saith that it will aver and prove its saidbill to be true, certain and sufficient in the law to be answered unto,and that said answer of the Farmers Loan & Trust Company, one ofthe defendants herein, is uncertain, untrue and insufficient to bereplied unto by this repliant; without this, that any oth
. The United States of America, complainant, v. the Union Pacific Railroad Company : the Oregon Short Line Railroad [et al.] defendants. Evidence and proceedings before the special examiner . fadvantage of exception to the manifold insufficiencies of said answer,for replication thereunto saith that it will aver and prove its saidbill to be true, certain and sufficient in the law to be answered unto,and that said answer of the Farmers Loan & Trust Company, one ofthe defendants herein, is uncertain, untrue and insufficient to bereplied unto by this repliant; without this, that any other matter orthing whatsoever in the said answer contained, material or effectualto be replied unto, confessed and avoided, traversed or denied, istrue; all of which matters and things this repliant is, and will be,ready to aver and prove as this Honorable Court shall direct, andhumbly prays as in and by its said bill it hath already prayed. Hiram E. Booth,United States Attorney, Solicitor for Complainant. C. A. Severance, Frank B. Kellogg, Of Counsel. Received a copy of the above replication this 4th day of May, 1908. P. L. Williams, Attorney for Fanners Loan cfc Trust Company. 49580—p 273.
Size: 1979px × 1263px
Photo credit: © Reading Room 2020 / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., bookauth, bookcentury1900, bookdecade1900, bookidcu31924092564636
