. The Value of roaded, multiple-use areas as recreation sites in three national forests of the Pacific Northwest. Forest roads Northwest, Pacific; Forests and forestry Northwest, Pacific Multiple use; Recreation areas Northwest, Pacific; National parks and reserves Northwest, Pacific; Wilderness areas Northwest, Pacific Recreational use. Table 22—Facilities users would like provided in the dispersed, roaded area where they were contacted1/ (In percent) Facility Campers Day users Statistical summary None, I like thing as they are 42 31 Z=; p < Garbage cans 4 3 48 Z=; p < 0.


. The Value of roaded, multiple-use areas as recreation sites in three national forests of the Pacific Northwest. Forest roads Northwest, Pacific; Forests and forestry Northwest, Pacific Multiple use; Recreation areas Northwest, Pacific; National parks and reserves Northwest, Pacific; Wilderness areas Northwest, Pacific Recreational use. Table 22—Facilities users would like provided in the dispersed, roaded area where they were contacted1/ (In percent) Facility Campers Day users Statistical summary None, I like thing as they are 42 31 Z=; p < Garbage cans 4 3 48 Z=; p < Toilets 36 44 Z=; p 7 Centrally located drinking water 19 31 Z^; p < Central sewage disposal 12 16 Z=; p < ; not significant Permanent fireplaces at sites 12 22 Z=; p < More developed campsites 5 7 Z=; p < ; not significant Horse corrals 2/ 1 2 Z=; p < ; not significant Signs y 3/ 1/ Based on the number of users 2/ A write-in response. 37 Less than 1 percent who responded: campers 881; day users 1, Figure 18.—The presence of trees, a level spot for a tent or RV, and scenery are important features to users. the absence of facilities acceptable or they would go elsewhere. 3. If managers followed user prefer- ences, they might change the nature of the opportunities enough to change user patterns. For example, if trash cans, toilets, and other conveniences were installed, the day users who presently do not camp in such areas (because lack of such conveniences is unacceptable to them) might then begin camping there, thus competing with current campers who find the lack of facilities acceptable. Some campers we contacted said they would like to have more facilities, until they recognized the effects this might have on the use of their favorite area— that more people with different goals might come there. They recognized the reality of the invasion/succession pro- cess (Clark and Stankey 1979b, Cl


Size: 1669px × 1497px
Photo credit: © The Book Worm / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No

Keywords: ., bo, bookcentury1900, bookcollectionbiodiversity, bookleafnumber31