. Relation between leading and the legibility of the printed page . the experiment. In the li>;.ht of these facts the fiverage reading-time for simila,rly leaded texts ,the mean variations, and theaverage number of mistakes made, were computed for each observerat a given distance. In addition, the total averages and meanvariations were computed for all similarly leaded teicts present-ed to all observers at a given distance, ji^rom these figures v/ereconstructed graphs for the individuals taken singly and collect-ively. In these graphs, as here presented, the initials repre-sent the differen
. Relation between leading and the legibility of the printed page . the experiment. In the li>;.ht of these facts the fiverage reading-time for simila,rly leaded texts ,the mean variations, and theaverage number of mistakes made, were computed for each observerat a given distance. In addition, the total averages and meanvariations were computed for all similarly leaded teicts present-ed to all observers at a given distance, ji^rom these figures v/ereconstructed graphs for the individuals taken singly and collect-ively. In these graphs, as here presented, the initials repre-sent the different observers and the letters A, B, and G indi-cate respectively the reading distances 126 cm., 176 cm., and 88cm. Thetotal graphs, made up from all the data collected ata given distance, are numbered I, II, and III to accord v/itn thesesame distances. On these graphs the reading time is represented inseconds ui^on ordinate and the leading, in points, alqng theline of abscissas. The mean variation from the average time iS-given in each case just below the grap
Size: 1336px × 1870px
Photo credit: © Reading Room 2020 / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., bookcentury1900, bookdecade1910, booksubjecttheses, bookyear1917
