. Florists' review [microform]. Floriculture. 1 ii r.^l-l'.i; ;l. I'll!'. The Florists^ Review 21 -I' I , ;(.(\l-ii'.| hy llllsilil onilcd 1)1- )il'C,|ll- I partii'-i tliat no iiursciy st(nl< |.| lie huiiylit in rastcrii M assacliu- liciaiisc (if tile |i()ssil)ilit it's of in .in. Mr. Wvnian stated tliat liis lurrui'ily sold cacli year scxcral ;^anil dollars' worth of stoci< at I .ix. .\rass., hut that it now stdls noth- , t iicrc on Hfcount of the scare. hcic were in all about fort\' present I ilie hearing:, whieh was liefort; the I : hoard, consisting of W. ^\. Orton, I T iiisset. A. F
. Florists' review [microform]. Floriculture. 1 ii r.^l-l'.i; ;l. I'll!'. The Florists^ Review 21 -I' I , ;(.(\l-ii'.| hy llllsilil onilcd 1)1- )il'C,|ll- I partii'-i tliat no iiursciy st(nl< |.| lie huiiylit in rastcrii M assacliu- liciaiisc (if tile |i()ssil)ilit it's of in .in. Mr. Wvnian stated tliat liis lurrui'ily sold cacli year scxcral ;^anil dollars' worth of stoci< at I .ix. .\rass., hut that it now stdls noth- , t iicrc on Hfcount of the scare. hcic were in all about fort\' present I ilie hearing:, whieh was liefort; the I : hoard, consisting of W. ^\. Orton, I T iiisset. A. F. Buryi'ss and (ieoryc 1 •^udwortli. Anionji' those who spoke , (ler for or against the proposed cjuar- ;, ine of certain sections of .\ew Kny- 1 d ajzainst the gy]isy niotli and the iwn tail niotli were .1. K. .M. L. Far- lar. A. ('. iiurnhani, Alton Hriy^s, 11. Wynian. Curtis \ve Smith ami .1. Stewart, all of Boston; \V. A. \ iiiicek. of the Rhode Island Xurser- -, Newport, U. ].; \V. K. Hritton, State I . tcunolojiist. New Ha\eii, Conn.; C. ]{. I ttis. Superiuteudent of State For- i i-i. Alhany. X. Y.; (ieorj;e Atwood, ' iii(d' of the liureau of Horticulture, Alliany. X. V.; .1. 1*. liuckley. Coniniis- ..iiicr of Agriculture, Maine; W. C. nkane. of Xew iranipsliire, and A. 'P. , of the ^Fassachusetts Ajiricul- iiiial CoUeye. Amherst, Mass. The nurserymen stronjily opposed the '( ](roducing evidence to show that the gypsx' moth is not distrihiiteii li\ the shi|iinent of nursery sto<dv from '^sachusetts. The uuisorymen also ulijci t to tlie interference of the fod- . lal <;o\ernment in the matter of com- I'afiny these jiests for fear that the -late of Massa<diusetts will withdraw it- siip|)ort, ai'jiuinji; that the state work I- -up( lior to what the feeen proven to 'Mrry 1 he egys of the ]iests. Uv. L. (). 'Howard, of the l)epartinenr of Agricul- iiiic. paid trihute to the elHcient work artment to \\ard (dimiuatinff the jiests and said he hcl
Size: 1336px × 1871px
Photo credit: © Library Book Collection / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., bookcontributoruniversityofillinoisurb, booksubjectfloriculture
