. Florists' review [microform]. Floriculture. 12 The Florists^ Review OCTOBEB 16, 1918. EVANS WINS PATENT CASE. October 10, in the District Court of United States for the District of In- diana, at Indianapolis, a decree was entered in favor of John A. Evans, of Bicbmond, against James E. Jones, of the same city, which, unless appeal is taken within thirty days, brings to a close a long and hotly contested legal battle involving the right to manufac- ture, sell and use a ventilator arm that has found a place in many hundreds of greenhouses. The case was started more than two years ago. The decr
. Florists' review [microform]. Floriculture. 12 The Florists^ Review OCTOBEB 16, 1918. EVANS WINS PATENT CASE. October 10, in the District Court of United States for the District of In- diana, at Indianapolis, a decree was entered in favor of John A. Evans, of Bicbmond, against James E. Jones, of the same city, which, unless appeal is taken within thirty days, brings to a close a long and hotly contested legal battle involving the right to manufac- ture, sell and use a ventilator arm that has found a place in many hundreds of greenhouses. The case was started more than two years ago. The decree is as follows: This cause having come on to be heard, upon the pleadings and proofs filed on behalf of both parties, and after hearing counsel for complain- ant and counsel for defendant, it is hereby ordered, adjudged and decreed as follows: 1. That Letters Patent of the United States Issued to John A. Evans, of Richmond, Indiana, as the assignee of Newton R. Evans, on the 20th day of March, 1906, and numbered 815,914, for Improvements in Window Lifters are good and valid in law, particularly as to claims 1, 4. 5 and 6 thereof, and that the said John A. Evans* the complainant herein, is the owner of said Letters Patent. 2. That the defendant, James E. Jones, hbs infringed upon the said Letters Patent, and par- ticularly claims 1, 4, 5 and 6 thereof. 3. That the complainant do recover of the de- fendant the profits, gains, and advantages which the said defendant has derived, received or made since March 20, 1900, by reason of said infringe- ment, and that the complainant do recover of the said defendant any and all damages which the complainant has sustained since said date, or shall sustain by reason of said infringement by the said defendant. 4. And it is hereby referred to the Master of this Court, who is hereby appointed to talie and state the account of said gains, profits and ad- vantages, and assess such damages and to report thereon with all convenient speed; and the
Size: 2752px × 908px
Photo credit: © Library Book Collection / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., bookcentury1900, bookdecad, booksubjectfloriculture, bookyear1912
