. United States Court of Appeals For the Ninth Circuit. atent in suit with the additionthereto of dotted lines showing the position of the bedwhen in front of the opening and also some explana-tory data. It is obvious that Drawing No. i discloses Mur-phys broad generic idea of means, to wit: a bedadapted to be moved about a vertical axis entirelythru an opening and shifted laterally in respect to suchopening when at the rear thereof and when at thefront thereof. It is also obvious that said broad, generic idea ofmeans is disclosed in each of the Drawings Nos. 2and 3. It is also obvious that sa
. United States Court of Appeals For the Ninth Circuit. atent in suit with the additionthereto of dotted lines showing the position of the bedwhen in front of the opening and also some explana-tory data. It is obvious that Drawing No. i discloses Mur-phys broad generic idea of means, to wit: a bedadapted to be moved about a vertical axis entirelythru an opening and shifted laterally in respect to suchopening when at the rear thereof and when at thefront thereof. It is also obvious that said broad, generic idea ofmeans is disclosed in each of the Drawings Nos. 2and 3. It is also obvious that said broad, generic idea ofmeans is disclosed in the said drawing, Fig. 3, of thereissued patent in suit. Now, the question is, how could Murphy have se-cured a patent covering such broad, generic idea ofmeans if the reissued patent in suit does not cover thesame? He was compelled to comply with the lawwhich provides that the inventor shall, in his patent,disclose the best method of carrying out or prac-ticing the invention. Murphy considered the use of. ?S k i ^51 Oj r; 11 ill ,^/,,>/.
Size: 1240px × 2014px
Photo credit: © Reading Room 2020 / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., bookauthorunitedst, bookcentury1900, bookdecade1920, bookyear1920
