Minnesota in three centuries, 1655-1908 . f the garrisonsvoted, which led to considerable discussion as to the proprietyof such a course. The following is the vote in detail by pre-cincts; Mr. Sibley receiving a majority of ninety in a total voteof 1208: Precincts. Sibley. Mitchell. St. Paul 151 153 St. Anthony 64 110 Little Canada 44 8 Stillwater 117 59 Marine 17 4 Falls St Croix 17 0 Snake River 10 0 Prairie 54 24 Sauk Rapids 3 60 Swan River 22 56 Crow Wing 8 48 Elk River 16 8 Nokaseppi 36 26 Lac qui Parle 12 0 Mendota 78 3 649 559 Prior to the assembling of the second session of the Terri-t
Minnesota in three centuries, 1655-1908 . f the garrisonsvoted, which led to considerable discussion as to the proprietyof such a course. The following is the vote in detail by pre-cincts; Mr. Sibley receiving a majority of ninety in a total voteof 1208: Precincts. Sibley. Mitchell. St. Paul 151 153 St. Anthony 64 110 Little Canada 44 8 Stillwater 117 59 Marine 17 4 Falls St Croix 17 0 Snake River 10 0 Prairie 54 24 Sauk Rapids 3 60 Swan River 22 56 Crow Wing 8 48 Elk River 16 8 Nokaseppi 36 26 Lac qui Parle 12 0 Mendota 78 3 649 559 Prior to the assembling of the second session of the Terri-torial Legislature, and in fact extending to 1853, began omciaLcriticism and censures, political strifes, and contentions whichengendered a condition of strenuous antagonism and bitter ani-mosities. While there were no political organizations, nor parti- .san questions at issue, there were a series of personal politicsand conflicts. There was the Sibley party, the Rice party, andthe Mitchell party, besides others. Each man was for himself. 2>
Size: 1411px × 1772px
Photo credit: © The Reading Room / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., bookauthorholcomberireturnira18, bookcentury1900, bookdecade1900
