. The Journal of comparative neurology and psychology. )e Ex[)(n-iinent, No. 1 was in-different to the behavior of No. 3 until he saw No. 8 with foodand his attention was not drawn to the food door until lu; saw No. Zget food th(M-e. His interest in No. 3 steadily increased nntil hegot food for himself. The same comment may be nuide npdn thebehavior of No. 3 when watching No. 2 in the Paper general, No. 4 lorded it over No. 0 and No. 5 when in the livingcages, but she invariably became attentive to them when she sawthem getting food in the experiment cage. Thus tlie facts would
. The Journal of comparative neurology and psychology. )e Ex[)(n-iinent, No. 1 was in-different to the behavior of No. 3 until he saw No. 8 with foodand his attention was not drawn to the food door until lu; saw No. Zget food th(M-e. His interest in No. 3 steadily increased nntil hegot food for himself. The same comment may be nuide npdn thebehavior of No. 3 when watching No. 2 in the Paper general, No. 4 lorded it over No. 0 and No. 5 when in the livingcages, but she invariably became attentive to them when she sawthem getting food in the experiment cage. Thus tlie facts would indicate that not only the act of the animal,but also the profitable result of that act was a necessary factor inproducing imitation. By further experimentation I hope to dis-cover the relative importance of these two elements. , ImitatKm in Monkeys. 443. Fig. 1. Old cage (see text, p. 355), Chute Experiment A. a, trap door; &,device to hold door shut; c, chute; d, string; e, iron for monkey to grasp,mrawn by B. Spencer Greenfield.) ^ 444 Jonrnnl of Comparative Neurology ajid Psychology.
Size: 1142px × 2187px
Photo credit: © Reading Room 2020 / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., bookauthorwistarinstituteofanat, bookcentury1900, bookdecade1900
