. In Superior Court of the County of San Bernardino, State of California. Department One. Cucamonga Vineyard Co. et al., plaintiff vs. San Antonio Water Co., defendant; no. 9187. ,1 above sea level was the elevation of the bottom onJan mry 15, 1699, s; tTiat next? A ihe next well ia experii:iental snaft no. 4, ibich from)lr. irasks testiuony the elevation of tlie water Burface V. i^90 wa^i 1410,5 feet; the elevation of Uie surface, ; 61 feet to water. Tijat was in 1Q90, according to!ir. Vrask, -^ ijiy subseqaer]t observations llian t>iat at any time? A There is noneteati
. In Superior Court of the County of San Bernardino, State of California. Department One. Cucamonga Vineyard Co. et al., plaintiff vs. San Antonio Water Co., defendant; no. 9187. ,1 above sea level was the elevation of the bottom onJan mry 15, 1699, s; tTiat next? A ihe next well ia experii:iental snaft no. 4, ibich from)lr. irasks testiuony the elevation of tlie water Burface V. i^90 wa^i 1410,5 feet; the elevation of Uie surface, ; 61 feet to water. Tijat was in 1Q90, according to!ir. Vrask, -^ ijiy subseqaer]t observations llian t>iat at any time? A There is noneteatified to except thtit iir. Trasktestified t at in 1900 he was there arid it was dry, Tiiewater plane had ^ione down. Si And ttiRt is all, is its ii That is all Uie observcuoions i have. Tixlo isshov^ on plaintiif exhibit 77 as well L, 99, But Uiat isthe aa ;e locality, practically. The elevation 1472, whichis half a foot hit^ tiian Uie one* ..x. Trask gives, andthe elevation of water, 1411, whic) is hialf a foot hi^^rtiiSdi r, Trask givee, anH I see there is an error in thedate,— 99 inetea^: of 90, The next well is tne i>te;mrt well, in which on February 17. I tolieve i obaerved that— yoarY i. 1900. i wa/it to verify truL date. Yea, ioat was Feb-ruary 17, 1900; at which tiae the water plane was 771feet above sea level; and on the same date tue idng wellwas observed ly ^iie — hat was the elevation of the BurfaceV A 1077 feet. Q Proceed, A On the aatae date the King well, the elevation of thewat r plane was 779 feet suid the elevation of tiie surface986 feet, Jfetraary 17, 1900t. cj Mij subsequent observation on either of those,? .. Iuere ie not, I never visited those any lixore. Tiienthe experimental shaft no. 3, on exhibit D, I ctiii onlydv-duce the elevation of water froa the FranlciBh u bta^intuniiel, asa I have lio observation directly on Uie it is 80 near the tuniiel tiiat practically it wouldbe Uie same as Uie tuniiCl. Or, in oti^er
Size: 1290px × 1937px
Photo credit: © The Reading Room / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., bo, bookcentury1900, bookdecade1900, bookidinsuperiorcourto07cuca
