. Journal of radiology . Fig. 16.—Inverted cecum, ascending colon and duodenal ulcer. Surgical removal of appendixverified roentgenological diagnosis, with relief of Fig. 17.—High situation of cecum and hepatic ascending colon. Roentgenological diagnosis of ap-pendicitis verified. Previous diagnosis was gall-bladderdisease. 368 POSITIONAL ANOMALIES OF THE INTESTINAL TRACT—HUBENY Fig. 18.—This and the two figures immediately following-are of the same patient. Clinical diagnosis was duodenalulcer. Roentgen examination of stomach and duodenumonly was r
. Journal of radiology . Fig. 16.—Inverted cecum, ascending colon and duodenal ulcer. Surgical removal of appendixverified roentgenological diagnosis, with relief of Fig. 17.—High situation of cecum and hepatic ascending colon. Roentgenological diagnosis of ap-pendicitis verified. Previous diagnosis was gall-bladderdisease. 368 POSITIONAL ANOMALIES OF THE INTESTINAL TRACT—HUBENY Fig. 18.—This and the two figures immediately following-are of the same patient. Clinical diagnosis was duodenalulcer. Roentgen examination of stomach and duodenumonly was requested, however, by suggestion, a completegastro-intestinal examination was performed, with an ul-timate diagnosis of appendiceal involvement Tl:i? wassurgically verified. This is an interesting anomav, thececum lies up in the hepatic region, is inverted, and goesdown as the ascending colon, then is continuous with thetransverse colon. See Fig. 19 and Fig. 20. This illus-trates the necessity of complete examination of the plain the presence of so-called phantom elicited upon vaginal Fig. 19.—This is the 24-hour sequel showing the locationof the cecum. See Fig. 18 and Fig. 20. ter
Size: 1505px × 1659px
Photo credit: © Reading Room 2020 / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., bookauthoramerican, bookcentury1900, bookdecade1920, bookyear1922
