. Contributions from the Botanical Laboratory, vol. 9. Botany; Botany. Fig. 1. Phlox ovata. West of White Sulphur Springs, Greenbrier County, W^est Fig. 2. Phlox ovata. In cultivation; originally from Virginia. 10. Phlox ovata Linne. Mountain Phlox. Plate 6. History.—In Plukenet's^ Mantissa of 1700 there was in- cluded a plant characterized as **Lychnidea fistulosa Mari- landica, Clinopodii vulgaris folio, flore amplo ; The figure shows this as a Phlox with remote, ovate, petioled leaves and a single flower subtended by a large bract. Linne^ named it Phlox ovata, basi
. Contributions from the Botanical Laboratory, vol. 9. Botany; Botany. Fig. 1. Phlox ovata. West of White Sulphur Springs, Greenbrier County, W^est Fig. 2. Phlox ovata. In cultivation; originally from Virginia. 10. Phlox ovata Linne. Mountain Phlox. Plate 6. History.—In Plukenet's^ Mantissa of 1700 there was in- cluded a plant characterized as **Lychnidea fistulosa Mari- landica, Clinopodii vulgaris folio, flore amplo ; The figure shows this as a Phlox with remote, ovate, petioled leaves and a single flower subtended by a large bract. Linne^ named it Phlox ovata, basing his diagnosis on the Plukenet figure, although Jackson' records that the specimen in his herbarium (which has several flowers in a corymb) was already there in 1753. Sir Joseph Banks, according to Sims,* recognized that Plukenet's figure and Linne's diagnosis referred to an ab- normal individual, and extended the name P. ovata to cover plants with corymbose flowers. Michaux,^ on the other hand, proposed P. latifolia for the many-flowered plants he collected in North Carolina. Pursh^ listed both ovata and latifolia, not realizing that they are identical. In the second edition of his Species Plantarum, Linne^ described another Phlox with broad leaves as P. carolvna. Bentham^ considered this to be conspecific with P. ovata, but separated three varieties, applying to one of them the com- bination P. Carolina a ovata. In 1870 Gray^ pointed out objections to this procedure, proposing instead P. ovata elatior; and later^° discarded the name Carolina entirely, as a synonym of P. ovata. In this he has been followed by most botanists, but a study of photographs^^ of the Linnean speci- mens of the two shows that they actually represent distinct species, and P. Carolina will be discussed at length on a sub- sequent page. 1 Mantissa 122, pi. 348, fig. 122-pl. 4. 1700. 2 Species Plantarum (1): 152. 1753. sSuppl. Proc. Linn. See. 124: 116. 1912. * Curtis's Botanical Magazine 15: pi. 528
Size: 1818px × 1375px
Photo credit: © The Book Worm / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., bookcentury1800, bookdecade1890, booksubjectbotany, bookyear1892
