. The study and criticism of Italian art : second series. ndin any work by Piero, while its resemblance withthe kerchief of Mme. Andres Madonna, and thatof the Virgin in the San Miniato Annunciation ismost striking. The same may be said of the foldsof drapery which, in Piero, are more angular andmore complicated, while here they undulate or formlarge creases, as we find them in Alessio, especiallyin his early The Child is not yet that doll endowed with theabsurd sagacity of a patriarch which we see later inAlessio, sometimes as a cherub, sometimes as anangel, and sometimes as the In
. The study and criticism of Italian art : second series. ndin any work by Piero, while its resemblance withthe kerchief of Mme. Andres Madonna, and thatof the Virgin in the San Miniato Annunciation ismost striking. The same may be said of the foldsof drapery which, in Piero, are more angular andmore complicated, while here they undulate or formlarge creases, as we find them in Alessio, especiallyin his early The Child is not yet that doll endowed with theabsurd sagacity of a patriarch which we see later inAlessio, sometimes as a cherub, sometimes as anangel, and sometimes as the Infant Christ. He isnot so fat as these, but his head is already too large,out of all proportion with his body, and his cheek isswollen in a way most characteristic of Baldovinettisbrush. He bears a certain resemblance to theChrist Child of Domenico Veneziano in the NationalGallery fresco; but he has absolutely nothing incommon with the stolid young Hercules, who 1 Particularly in the Baptism and the Transfiguration ofthe Florence Academy. r- h o o x CD W. o ou I—I wo Q
Size: 1504px × 1662px
Photo credit: © Reading Room 2020 / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., bookcentury1900, bookdecade1900, booksubjectartital, bookyear1902
