United States Court of Appeals For the Ninth Circuit . .^ /Cc.^. Y ? ^. No, 2390 ffltrrtttt (Hmvi of App^ate 3F0r tl(^ Jfmtlf OHrrutt. Evnmmpt of Swcrln. (IN THREE VOLUMES.) TART MINING COMPANY, a Corporation, Appellant, vs. THAN BOURNE, Jr., and LILLIAN E. BOURNE, His Wife, Appellees. VOLUME in. (Pages 705 to 1045, Inclusive.) Upon Appeal from the United States District Courtfor the District of Idaho, Northern Division. FiLMER Bros. Print. 330 Jackson St., S. Cal. Jonathan Bourne, Jr., and Lillian E. Bourne. 705 (Testimony of Walter H. Wiley.) Q. Isnt it mathematically impossible for
United States Court of Appeals For the Ninth Circuit . .^ /Cc.^. Y ? ^. No, 2390 ffltrrtttt (Hmvi of App^ate 3F0r tl(^ Jfmtlf OHrrutt. Evnmmpt of Swcrln. (IN THREE VOLUMES.) TART MINING COMPANY, a Corporation, Appellant, vs. THAN BOURNE, Jr., and LILLIAN E. BOURNE, His Wife, Appellees. VOLUME in. (Pages 705 to 1045, Inclusive.) Upon Appeal from the United States District Courtfor the District of Idaho, Northern Division. FiLMER Bros. Print. 330 Jackson St., S. Cal. Jonathan Bourne, Jr., and Lillian E. Bourne. 705 (Testimony of Walter H. Wiley.) Q. Isnt it mathematically impossible for a planedipping at an angle of 70 degrees and striking north80 west, to intersect with a plane which meets it atan angle of 30 degrees and dipping 45 to 50 degreesin its steepest place—from 30 to 50 would be fairerprobably—to give that form of an e&gQ^. A. That is a different proposition, and moreover,all of your propositions seem to not quite correspondwith the facts. You took a plane with a strike ofnorth 80 west; that you assume as the strike of thefault,govuscourtsca9briefs0866
Size: 1544px × 1618px
Photo credit: © The Reading Room / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., bookauthorunitedstatescourtofap, bookcentury1900, bookdecade1910
