. A genealogy of the Warne family in America : principally the descendants of Thomas Warne, born 1652, died 1722, one of the twenty-four proprietors of East New Jersey . 46, by whom he had Phebe, b. 7 April, 1640; Nathaniel,b. 5 Feb., 1642, and Mary, b. 17 Feb., 1644. By his secondwife, formerly Mrs. Stanley, he had William, Elizabeth andSarah. After his second wifes death he married again, 1657,Mrs. Bridget Sanford, who bore him John, Samuel, b. , 1658, and William, b. January 28, 1660. There is noRebecca among any of these. But Christopher Stanley, thesecond Mrs. Phillipss first husban


. A genealogy of the Warne family in America : principally the descendants of Thomas Warne, born 1652, died 1722, one of the twenty-four proprietors of East New Jersey . 46, by whom he had Phebe, b. 7 April, 1640; Nathaniel,b. 5 Feb., 1642, and Mary, b. 17 Feb., 1644. By his secondwife, formerly Mrs. Stanley, he had William, Elizabeth andSarah. After his second wifes death he married again, 1657,Mrs. Bridget Sanford, who bore him John, Samuel, b. , 1658, and William, b. January 28, 1660. There is noRebecca among any of these. But Christopher Stanley, thesecond Mrs. Phillipss first husband, did have by her a daugh-ter Rebecca, who married Robert Lord. (See Savage ) According to the Carhart Genealogy, Rebecca Lord andher husband, Robert Lord, each inherited 1,000 acres of landin York county, Maine, from Major William Phillips. Butthat speaks nothing, especially as there were seventeen otherpeople, some of them children, others occupying other rela-tions to him, and some apparently no relationship at all, whoall had the same quantity left them, i. e., 19,000 acres in all,known as the Fluellen tract, comprising Alfred, Sanford ^ WARNE GENEALOGY 59 Susanna (Stanley) Phillips also in her will left bequestsnot only to her two daughters, Rebecca and Martha, but toMary Field, her daughter-in-law, as well as to her childrenby Phillips, and to some of his other children. It seems tohave been customary in those days to do that sort of thing,and sometimes step children in a will were called children,or children-in-law, i. e., sons-in-law and daughters-in-law,differently from those terms as applied now. The children of Robert and Rebecca Lord were: Robert, b. Apr. 6, 1661; Thomas, b. May 18, 1663, (diedyoung) ; Mary, b. July 13, 1668, and Sarah, most likely bornin England, her parents evidently having gone there to endtheir days. The said Robert Lord and his family, while inBoston, lived in a house there that came from his father-in-law. Thomas Lord,


Size: 1469px × 1701px
Photo credit: © Reading Room 2020 / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No

Keywords: ., bookcentury1900, bookdecade1910, bookidgenealogyofw, bookyear1911