. Journal. e the oils wereexposed to the action of the reagents, and for theseexperiments Oils 1 and 2 were used :— Table 1 oil. Time. Hubl. Wijs. Hanus. Hours. 2 % % % i 33-3 8 33-9 12 34-3 18 35-9 24 37-3 48 38-1 Table 2 oil. Time. 8121824 48 Hubl. Wijs. Hanus % Iodine. % Iodine. 34-4 36-0 36-4 38-2 37-1 40-8 38-0 43-7 41-7 46-5 42-2 50-7 42-5 52-0 Kt this stage the use of Hanus solution wasabandoned because it was found that very slightdifferences in t
. Journal. e the oils wereexposed to the action of the reagents, and for theseexperiments Oils 1 and 2 were used :— Table 1 oil. Time. Hubl. Wijs. Hanus. Hours. 2 % % % i 33-3 8 33-9 12 34-3 18 35-9 24 37-3 48 38-1 Table 2 oil. Time. 8121824 48 Hubl. Wijs. Hanus % Iodine. % Iodine. 34-4 36-0 36-4 38-2 37-1 40-8 38-0 43-7 41-7 46-5 42-2 50-7 42-5 52-0 Kt this stage the use of Hanus solution wasabandoned because it was found that very slightdifferences in the amounts of bromme used formaking up the reagent, led to varying resultsbeing obtained. Thus, with a slight excess ofbromine a high percentage was absorbed in two 342 RADCUFFE AND POLYCHRONIS—lODnSE ABSORPTION OF HYDROCARBON OILS. [Mar. 31, 1018. hours, whilst with very little less bromine presentthe same perooutairo was attaiaetl only after theuiixturo had stood for foity-eisht houiV;. 5 15 = 14 t IS. 2 i 6 8 10 12 14 18 18 20 22 24Time in hours.
Size: 1527px × 1635px
Photo credit: © Reading Room 2020 / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., bookcentury1800, bookdecade1880, booksubjectchemist, bookyear1882
