British medical journal . ^^i^^^^ ViK. 3.—Cas3 I. Showingaiiiouati patient could open hermouth alter one months treat-ijicnt. Before treatment shetoiild not separate her teeth. Fig. 4.—Case I. Fifty-twodaya after first treatment. 8 mm. apart. They contained altogether millicurics ofemanation in glass capillary tubes. I leftthem in till .\pril 19th. The strength would then have been reduced toD millicuries, giving an average of millicuries for thirty-seven and a half hours. On April 21st the patient could openher mouth a little better, and on April 27th considerablvbet


British medical journal . ^^i^^^^ ViK. 3.—Cas3 I. Showingaiiiouati patient could open hermouth alter one months treat-ijicnt. Before treatment shetoiild not separate her teeth. Fig. 4.—Case I. Fifty-twodaya after first treatment. 8 mm. apart. They contained altogether millicurics ofemanation in glass capillary tubes. I leftthem in till .\pril 19th. The strength would then have been reduced toD millicuries, giving an average of millicuries for thirty-seven and a half hours. On April 21st the patient could openher mouth a little better, and on April 27th considerablvbetter. The tumour was also less fixed. On Ajiril 29th Iinserted six needles containing millicuries altogether,from behind forwards {average millicuries), for thirty-fiveand a half hours. Immediately after removal they were re-inserted for tweuty-foar hours at right angles to their formerposition (Fig. 2). The average was millicuries for twenty-four hours. On May 18th, a month and a day after treatmentwas


Size: 1427px × 1750px
Photo credit: © The Reading Room / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No

Keywords: ., bookcentury1800, bookdecade1850, booksubjectmedicine, bookyear185