. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology at Harvard College. Zoology. 170 Bulletin Museum of Comparative Zoology, Vol. 144, No. 4. Diagram 5 Diagram 5. Possible relationships between species groups of Pseudofremia. Species that give good evidence for this arrangement are named close to lines connecting groups; lines do not imply direction of evolution. Species groups arranged in this diagram roughly as they are distributed geographically; compare Map 5. 33a. 33b. 34a. 34b. Telopodite process of the double saber type (Fig. 145); Anderson Co., Tenn. deprehendor Telopodite process a single
. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology at Harvard College. Zoology. 170 Bulletin Museum of Comparative Zoology, Vol. 144, No. 4. Diagram 5 Diagram 5. Possible relationships between species groups of Pseudofremia. Species that give good evidence for this arrangement are named close to lines connecting groups; lines do not imply direction of evolution. Species groups arranged in this diagram roughly as they are distributed geographically; compare Map 5. 33a. 33b. 34a. 34b. Telopodite process of the double saber type (Fig. 145); Anderson Co., Tenn. deprehendor Telopodite process a single saber 34 Eighteen to 20 ocelli; gonopods as in Fig. 141; Carter Co., Ky. carterensis Five to 8 ocelli; gonopods as in Figs. 125, 126; Pendleton Co., W. Va. — lusciosa Species Groups in Pseudofremia The arrangement of the species discussed here is admittedly a somewhat artificial one. As I have already mentioned, there are many species as yet undiscovered and iindescribed; perhaps they will later fill gaps that will make possible more natural groupings. The species groups I propose are based on a combination of morpho- logical evidence (mostly drawn from male gonopods) and geographical distribution. carterensis- and P. depre- hendor, for example, are placed in the hohbsi-group, but are widely separated from the other species of the group geo- graphically. The arrangement of species into groups that are more or less coherent geographi- cally and perhaps phylogenetically related makes it possible to compare each species only with those closest to it in the species diagnoses given below. The relationships between groups ex- pressed in Diagram 5 is likewise specu- lative, and is based on evidence presented in the species descriptions Please note that these images are extracted from scanned page images that may have been digitally enhanced for readability - coloration and appearance of these illustrations may not perfectly resemble the original Harvard
Size: 1801px × 1387px
Photo credit: © Book Worm / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., bookauthorharvarduniversity, bookcentury1900, booksubjectzoology
