Smithsonian miscellaneous collections . 5 in 1932, 1934,and 1947 are based on Dr. Abbots habit of reading the silver-diskpyrheliometer. L. B. Aldrich made a few observations with 5bisin 1932. Since there is a small personal equation in reading the silver-diskpyrheliometer more comparisons were made in 1952 between and the standard water-flow instrument No. 5. The results of 1 Smithsonian Misc. Coll., vol. 87, No. 15, 1932. 2 Smithsonian Misc. Coll., vol. 92, No. 13, 1934. 3 Smithsonian Misc. Coll., vol. no, No. 5, 1948. SMITHSONIAN MISCELLANEOUS COLLECTIONS, VOL. 122, NO. 5 2 SMI
Smithsonian miscellaneous collections . 5 in 1932, 1934,and 1947 are based on Dr. Abbots habit of reading the silver-diskpyrheliometer. L. B. Aldrich made a few observations with 5bisin 1932. Since there is a small personal equation in reading the silver-diskpyrheliometer more comparisons were made in 1952 between and the standard water-flow instrument No. 5. The results of 1 Smithsonian Misc. Coll., vol. 87, No. 15, 1932. 2 Smithsonian Misc. Coll., vol. 92, No. 13, 1934. 3 Smithsonian Misc. Coll., vol. no, No. 5, 1948. SMITHSONIAN MISCELLANEOUS COLLECTIONS, VOL. 122, NO. 5 2 SMITHSONIAN MISCELLANEOUS COLLECTIONS VOL. 122 1952 are based on A. G. Froilands habit of reading the silver-diskpyrheliometer. In order to insure comparable results with the water-flow pyrheliometer no changes were made in the instrument. Figure 1, A, B, and C, shows the instrument in some detail. Thetwo chambers a b c and a b c are almost exactly the same in all de-tails. The distilled water enters at d and divides into two streams at.
Size: 1276px × 1959px
Photo credit: © The Reading Room / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., bookcentury1800, bookdecade1860, bookidsmiths, booksubjectscience
