. California fish and game. Fisheries -- California; Game and game-birds -- California; Fishes -- California; Animal Population Groups; Pêches; Gibier; Poissons. GOLDEN TROUT SYSTEMATICS 211 nine samples divided into two groups, one containing UWMC and LSSC ( units), and the other LKR-2, 3, 4, TMC, LSGC, USGC, and RC ( units). Separation between these two groups could not be attributed to any single character or suite of characters and appeared to result from small differences in several characters. No further inferences regarding phenetic affinities were made since higher level clust
. California fish and game. Fisheries -- California; Game and game-birds -- California; Fishes -- California; Animal Population Groups; Pêches; Gibier; Poissons. GOLDEN TROUT SYSTEMATICS 211 nine samples divided into two groups, one containing UWMC and LSSC ( units), and the other LKR-2, 3, 4, TMC, LSGC, USGC, and RC ( units). Separation between these two groups could not be attributed to any single character or suite of characters and appeared to result from small differences in several characters. No further inferences regarding phenetic affinities were made since higher level clusters were apparently affected by sampling variation. This was indicated by the fact that LKR-3 and LKR-4 did not join until units, yet the two samples were statistically identical for means of all 11 characters (Table 2). Canonical analysis of the 11 character data set yielded 11 characteristic roots (canonical variates) which accounted for all of the phenetic variation. Of these, only the first explained an appreciable proportion () of the variation and had an eigenvalue greater than Characteristic root II accounted for of the variation, but its eigenvalue of was not significantly different from zero (Wilks's lambda test). Uni-dimensional Hubbs-o-grams displaying univari- ate statistics of each sample along canonical variate I are provided (Figure 3). Characters contributing heavily to separation along this vector included number of vertebrae, lateral series scale rows, pelvic fin rays, and pectoral fin rays (Table 3).. EUCLIDIAN DISTANCE —I— 20i) —I 2SjD FIGURE 2. Phenogram from UPGMA cluster analysis of the Euclidian distance matrix. The co- phenetic correlation res was Please note that these images are extracted from scanned page images that may have been digitally enhanced for readability - coloration and appearance of these illustrations may not perfectly resemble the original California. Dept. of Fish and
Size: 2197px × 1137px
Photo credit: © Book Worm / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., bookauthorcaliforniadeptoffishandgame, bookauthorcaliforniafish
