. Annals of the South African Museum = Annale van die Suid-Afrikaanse Museum. Natural history. Fig. 8. Titanosuchidae represented by Jonkeria. Skull in lateral, dorsal and ventral view. 5. Lamiasaurus newtoni Watson, 1914 This jaw fragment cannot be identified even as to family —it may be either titanosuchid or anteosaurid. 6. Titanosuchus dubius (Haughton, 1915) The teeth roots preserved only allow one to identify the specimen as being of the family Titanosuchidae. 7. Jonkeria truculenta Van Hoepen, 1916 Besides the good holotype, which consists of a good skull and much of the postcranial ske
. Annals of the South African Museum = Annale van die Suid-Afrikaanse Museum. Natural history. Fig. 8. Titanosuchidae represented by Jonkeria. Skull in lateral, dorsal and ventral view. 5. Lamiasaurus newtoni Watson, 1914 This jaw fragment cannot be identified even as to family —it may be either titanosuchid or anteosaurid. 6. Titanosuchus dubius (Haughton, 1915) The teeth roots preserved only allow one to identify the specimen as being of the family Titanosuchidae. 7. Jonkeria truculenta Van Hoepen, 1916 Besides the good holotype, which consists of a good skull and much of the postcranial skeleton, there is another good skull with lower jaw known. In the South African Museum collection there are a number of specimens of which I have described the dentition. All these specimens show that the teeth are too variable for iise in distinguishing between species of the genus. The genws Jonkeria is distinguishable from Titanosuchus on features of the Please note that these images are extracted from scanned page images that may have been digitally enhanced for readability - coloration and appearance of these illustrations may not perfectly resemble the original South African Museum. Cape Town : The Museum
Size: 1703px × 1466px
Photo credit: © Library Book Collection / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., bookcentury1800, bookdecade1890, booksubjectnaturalhistory, booky
